Remote Ship Inspection Drone vs Scaffold Cost & Downtime Tool
Compare drone-assisted ship inspection with full scaffold/staging access without assuming the drone replaces every close-up or measurement task. Simple mode compares drone scan + physical follow-up against full scaffold access. Advanced mode adds multiple tanks/holds/structures, drone applicability, follow-up share, staging labor/material, critical-path overlap, data processing, owned-drone program cost and fleet economics.
Fast Drone-Assisted vs Full-Scaffold Screen
Simple mode assumes all method hours affect the vessel's inspection critical path. Drone-assisted inspection includes the entered physical follow-up hours for findings, tactile checks, NDT or locations the drone cannot credit.
Fleet / Survey Program Basis
Drone-Assisted Inspection Cost
Full Scaffold / Staging Cost
Inspection-Area Register
Drone applicability is the share that can realistically be scanned by the selected drone method. Physical verification is the share of drone-scanned area expected to need tactile/NDT/manual follow-up.
| Tank / hold / structure | Area m² | Drone applicability % | Drone productivity m²/h | Physical verification % | Scaffold coverage % | Inspection complexity |
|---|
Owned-Drone Program Economics
Set CAPEX to zero if the drone inspection is fully outsourced and only per-campaign service costs matter.