Remote Inspection Access Decision Support
Remote Ship Inspection Drone vs Scaffold Cost & Downtime Tool
Compare drone-based remote inspection, full scaffold access and a targeted hybrid plan for tanks, holds and high structures. Model access preparation, inspection productivity, contact-measurement follow-up, disruption, coating touch-up, surveyor time, vessel downtime and repeated-campaign break-even.
Inspection Campaign
Treat survey credit as an input. A low acceptance setting automatically pushes the decision toward targeted or full direct access instead of assuming the drone replaces every close-up requirement.
$
/ day
$
/ day
days
days
Quick Inspection Scope
m²
%
%
%
Drone / Remote Inspection
$
$
/ day
m² / day
days
%
days
$
$
Scaffold / Staging Access
$
$
/ day
m² / day
days
days
%
$
$
Compartment & Zone Schedule
Each zone has its own drone suitability, direct-contact burden and access productivity. The hybrid option flies the broad scope first, then sizes targeted access for the unresolved physical-inspection requirement.
| Zone | Area m² | Drone suitability % | Contact % | Rework % | Drone m²/day | Scaffold m²/day | Drone setup days |
|---|
Advanced Commercial Inputs
$
$
/ day
%
days
$
$
$
$
/ day
days
days
%
$
$
% of full
% of full
Important: This is a commercial and access-planning screen. Remote inspection technique acceptance depends on survey scope, flag, class, survey plan, evidence quality, approved suppliers and whether direct contact or thickness measurements remain necessary. Do not treat a modeled drone saving as automatic survey credit.