Hormuz Traffic Stuck at Three Ships a Day as Insurance and Spill Risks Escalate

The Strait of Hormuz remains open to limited vessel movements, but the latest traffic data show that commercial activity has again fallen to an exceptionally low level. Preliminary tracking data recorded only three vessel transits per day from July 22 through July 24, including the VLCC New Giant carrying two million barrels of Iraqi Basrah crude and the laden Romania Prosperity, which later appeared outside the strait near Fujairah with Murban crude. At the same time, the operating environment around the waterway has acquired two additional complications. Marine insurers now have model policy wording allowing cover on a vessel to cease when an owner makes a payment connected with passage through Iranian waters, reflecting concerns over sanctions and terrorism legislation, while satellite monitoring has identified oil leaking from two tankers near Iran’s Larak Island. One spill is associated with the previously attacked Greek-owned tanker Kavomaleas, while the identity of the second AIS-dark vessel has not been confirmed. The developments leave Hormuz functioning with limited traffic while physical security, insurance, compliance and environmental risks continue to overlap.

Strait of Hormuz Operations Monitor

Operator Impact Snapshot

Vessel traffic remains severely constrained while route selection, war-risk pricing, sanctions exposure and damage from previous attacks continue to complicate commercial passage.

Commodity Transits HIGH
3/day
July 22–24

Preliminary tracking recorded only three commodity-vessel transits through the strait on each of three consecutive days.

Broader Crossing Rate HIGH
~13/day
post-truce average

Kpler’s wider crossing dataset fell from roughly 45 per day during the truce period to about 13 after fighting resumed.

Iranian Route Share WATCH
~90%
July 15–22

Most recent broader traffic has shifted onto the Iranian-defined route rather than the Omani alternative.

Hull War Risk HIGH
7.5–10%
of hull value

Additional war-risk pricing remains at levels capable of adding millions of dollars to a single vessel transit.

Confirmed Oil Slicks HIGH
2
near Larak Island

Satellite monitoring identified leakage from Kavomaleas and a second unidentified AIS-dark tanker.

Traffic Compression
Truce-period average
~45/day
Post-truce broader average
~13/day
Latest commodity series
3/day
Data note: the 13-per-day figure comes from Kpler’s broader crossing dataset, while the three-per-day figure is the narrower commodity-vessel series reported for July 22–24. They should not be treated as identical traffic measures.
Current Risk Stack
Physical attack exposure HIGH
War-risk insurance cost HIGH
Transit-payment compliance HIGH
AIS / routing transparency WATCH
Pollution / salvage exposure WATCH
July 24 Strait Status

Hormuz Shipping Risk Dashboard

The latest operating picture combines extremely low visible commodity traffic with concentrated routing, expensive war-risk cover and a new sanctions-related insurance issue around transit payments.

Latest Commodity Traffic 3/day
Same preliminary transit count on July 22, July 23 and July 24.
Broader Traffic Decline -70%
Kpler comparison between the truce-period average and post-conflict average.
Iranian Route Share ~90%
Share of broader crossings using the Iranian route during July 15–22.
AIS-Dark Activity 19
Vessels identified moving without AIS in the waterway by Windward.
Scroll sideways to view the full Hormuz update ← →
Indicator Latest Reading Reference Point Current Situation Operator Exposure
Commodity-Vessel Transits 3/day July 22–24 Preliminary tracking showed exactly three transits on each of three consecutive days. SEVERELY REDUCED
The latest narrow commodity-vessel series remains near standstill despite individual crude and bulk movements.
Tanker owners, LNG operators, commodity traders, Gulf exporters and chartering desks.
Broader Vessel Crossings ~13/day post-truce average Approximately 45 crossings per day between June 7 and July 7. -70%
Kpler’s wider risk-and-compliance dataset shows that the recovery achieved during the truce has largely reversed.
All Gulf-connected commercial shipping, port planners, terminals and marine-service providers.
Route Concentration ~90% Iranian route share During the truce the split was closer to 60% Iranian route and 40% Omani route. CONCENTRATED
The vessels still crossing have shifted heavily toward the Iranian-defined corridor.
Navigation teams, insurers, sanctions teams and operators assessing route-specific exposure.
Transit-Payment Insurance Clause Cover can cease new LMA model wording Published July 23 for use by marine hull underwriters. COMPLIANCE RISK
Under the model clause, a financial or non-financial payment connected with passage can cause cover on the relevant vessel to cease because of sanctions or terrorism-law exposure.
Owners, managers, insurers, lenders, compliance officers and charterers arranging Hormuz passage.
Additional War-Risk Premium 7.5–10% of hull value Approximately 1% to 3% of hull value only weeks earlier. VERY HIGH
Insurance can now represent a multi-million-dollar single-voyage cost for high-value tankers and gas carriers.
Tanker owners, LNG carriers, cargo interests, underwriters, lenders and voyage-charter counterparties.
Kavomaleas Spill Active slick near Larak Island The Greek-owned tanker was previously attacked south of the strait and later towed into Iranian waters. POLLUTION
Satellite observations show oil leaking from the vessel and drifting toward the Iranian islands.
Salvors, pollution-response contractors, insurers, coastal authorities and ship managers.
Second Tanker Spill Identity unknown AIS-dark tanker The vessel appears to have remained in approximately the same location since May. MONITOR
A second slick has been detected near Larak, with satellite data providing more visibility than public AIS.
Environmental response teams, coastal authorities, insurers and maritime-intelligence providers.
AIS-Dark Vessel Activity 19 vessels Windward identification A large cluster was reported on the Iranian side with a smaller group detected in the southern lane. VISIBILITY GAP
Public AIS alone does not represent all traffic currently moving through the strait.
Fleet-security teams, insurers, commodity desks, port agents and sanctions-screening providers.
New Giant Crude Transit 2.0M bbl Iraqi Basrah crude The VLCC exited Hormuz on July 23 and was reported heading toward Rizhao, China. PASSAGE OCCURRED
Large crude shipments are still capable of moving through the strait, but individual passages remain exceptional compared with normal traffic.
Iraqi exporters, Asian refiners, VLCC operators and crude-trading desks.
Ship Universe Interactive Market Tool

Hormuz Transit Exposure Analyzer

Compare restricted Strait of Hormuz traffic with higher-throughput conditions while estimating vessel war-risk costs and the time required to move a waiting fleet through the chokepoint. Traffic and insurance assumptions are fully adjustable.

Commodity Series 3/day
Broader Post-Truce ~13/day
Truce Average ~45/day
War Risk Range 7.5–10%
Build a Transit Scenario
ships/day
Use presets above or enter a custom rate.
ships/day
Default uses Kpler’s approximately 45-per-day truce average.
ships
Scenario input rather than a live estimate of the current queue.
$M
Used to calculate illustrative additional war-risk cost.
%
8.75% is the midpoint of the reported 7.5% to 10% range.
%
2% represents the midpoint of the earlier 1% to 3% range.
Calculated Transit & Insurance Exposure
Throughput Loss 93.3% versus reference rate
Days to Move Waiting Fleet 33.3 at selected transit rate
Additional Delay +31.1 days versus reference throughput
War-Risk Premium Per Vessel $8.75M selected hull and rate
Earlier Premium Reference $2.00M using earlier war-risk rate
Aggregate Premium Exposure $875M if all scenario vessels paid same rate
Transit Capacity Comparison
Selected daily passage rate compared with the reference throughput entered above.
Reference Rate
45/day
Selected Rate
3/day
War-Risk Rate Position 8.75%
0% 2.5% 5% 7.5% 10%
Transit Compression Multiple 15.0×
Reference throughput divided by the selected daily rate.
Premium Increase Per Vessel +$6.75M
Difference between the selected and earlier war-risk assumptions.
Premium Multiple 4.38×
Selected war-risk rate divided by the earlier reference rate.
Scenario note: Traffic datasets use different vessel categories and tracking methodologies, so the three-per-day commodity-vessel count and broader Kpler crossing figures should not be combined as though they are the same measure. Insurance calculations are illustrative only. Actual premiums depend on vessel type, flag, ownership, cargo, route, underwriter, sanctions screening and policy wording. A transit-related payment may also create separate coverage and legal issues under policies incorporating the new LMA model clause.
Feedback Welcome

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements.

Please click here to get in touch
By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact