UR E27 Equipment Procurement Checker

UR E27 Equipment Procurement Checker
UR E27 is turning cyber resilience into a newbuild procurement issue. Owners, yards and ship managers can no longer buy a control system, navigation system, cargo system, power-management system, monitoring platform or connected onboard device based only on price, delivery time and technical performance. The supplier also needs to prove that the system is cyber-ready, documented, maintainable, recoverable and suitable for safe integration into the vessel network.
Use the simple checker for a fast buying-screen before requesting quotes. Use the in-depth checker when comparing suppliers, preparing an RFP, reviewing a yard package or checking whether a manufacturer’s compliance file is strong enough for class review.
Important: This tool is a procurement screening aid, not a class approval, type approval, legal opinion or substitute for the vessel’s classification society. Use it to identify gaps before purchase orders, FAT, SAT, commissioning or newbuild delivery.
Simple UR E27 Equipment Procurement Checker
Use this fast screen before a purchase order, maker list approval, yard package review or supplier meeting. It gives a quick procurement risk rating and a list of missing evidence to request.
Select the evidence the supplier can provide to see the procurement readiness level.
- Start selecting the items above to build the supplier request list.
Copy-ready supplier request wording
In-Depth UR E27 Equipment Procurement Checker
Use this version for supplier comparison, newbuild maker-list review, cyber-secure equipment procurement, RFP scoring, FAT readiness and class-document package planning.
Project and equipment profile
Supplier documentation package
Technical cyber capability screen
Commercial and integration cost screen
Complete the project profile, documentation and cyber capability screen to see the procurement recommendation.
Missing supplier evidence
- Select the supplier evidence available above to build the gap list.
Procurement recommendation
Request the supplier’s UR E27 compliance matrix and class approval route before accepting the equipment package.
| Buyer checkpoint | Pass signal | Commercial risk if missing | Procurement action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approval path | Type approval, statement of compliance, class review or clear matrix. | Late redesign, class comments, FAT delay or substitute equipment. | Make approval evidence a bid requirement. |
| Asset inventory | Hardware, software, firmware, interfaces and versions are listed. | Ship asset inventory and cyber commissioning file become incomplete. | Reject vague “standard package” responses. |
| Network flows | Ports, protocols, data flows, zones and external links are documented. | Yard cannot integrate system cleanly into E26 vessel architecture. | Require topology diagrams before maker approval. |
| Security capabilities | Access, malware protection, logging, communication integrity and recovery are demonstrated. | Supplier sells hardware, but cyber functions are unproven. | Ask for tested capability evidence, not marketing language. |
| Lifecycle support | Patch, vulnerability, change, end-of-life and recovery procedures exist. | Owner inherits unsupported cyber risk after delivery. | Include support period and update obligations in the contract. |
| FAT and SAT readiness | Cyber test plan and acceptance criteria are included. | Cyber compliance becomes a commissioning surprise. | Put cyber tests into FAT, SAT and delivery milestones. |
Copy-ready RFP clause for suppliers
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements.
Please click here to get in touch