Twenty New PCTCs Will Get Level-2 Autonomous Navigation

🔔 Subscribe to ShipUniverse Weekly →

CIDO Shipping has signed an agreement with HD Hyundai subsidiary Avikus to install the HiNAS Control autonomous navigation and digital-operation system across 20 LNG dual-fuel, 7,600-CEU pure car and truck carriers now under construction at China Merchants Heavy Industry in China. The ships will use Avikus’ Smart Standard subscription package and begin entering service from 2027. HiNAS Control can automatically manage vessel heading and engine RPM, follow an optimized route and respond to collision risks, while the bridge team remains responsible for the vessel and can immediately resume manual control. The agreement also establishes a framework covering another 12 planned PCTCs, potentially expanding deployment to 32 ships.

Next-Generation PCTC Fleet

Twenty new car carriers will be built with automated navigation control

CIDO Shipping is moving HiNAS Control into a large newbuilding series, integrating AI-based navigation, collision avoidance and engine-RPM optimization directly into the bridge operating environment.

CONTRACTED DEPLOYMENT • FIRST SHIPS FROM 2027
Initial Fleet 20 PCTCs covered by the agreement
Per Ship 7,600 CEU vehicle capacity
Total Capacity 152K CEU across the initial 20 ships
Propulsion LNG DF LNG dual-fuel newbuildings
Potential Fleet 32 if another 12 planned vessels join
1. Sense Radar, AIS, cameras and navigation data build a real-time picture around the vessel.
2. Decide & Control HiNAS evaluates route, collision risk and operating conditions, then controls heading and RPM when engaged.
3. Human Oversight Licensed bridge personnel remain on watch and can immediately intervene or return the ship to manual control.
Level 2 does not mean crewless

Avikus describes HiNAS Control as Level 2 autonomous navigation, but the system remains assistive. The master retains authority and a certified officer must maintain a safe navigational watch.

The program could extend well beyond 20 ships

The signed agreement covers the 20 vessels currently under construction and creates a framework for another 12 ships within the same newbuilding program, potentially taking deployment to 243,200 CEU of capacity.

Exactly What Level-2 HiNAS Control Can Do

The system moves beyond route advice by interfacing with navigation and propulsion controls, but bridge responsibility remains onboard.
Bridge Function Information Used HiNAS Control Role Vessel Response Human Role Automation Status
Situational Awareness Radar, AIS, electro-optical cameras, infrared cameras and other navigational inputs. Sensor fusion creates a combined operating picture and identifies surrounding traffic and hazards. Targets and navigation conditions are continuously assessed. Officer monitors the situation and system behavior. AI Assisted
Route Following Planned track, vessel position and navigation conditions. Calculates steering actions required to remain on the planned route. Heading can be adjusted automatically. Bridge team supervises and may override. Automated Control
Collision Avoidance Detected vessels, relative movement, navigation route and surrounding traffic. Assesses collision risk and calculates avoidance actions. Route and heading can be altered while the system is engaged. Officer maintains watch and remains responsible for safe navigation. Automated Control
Engine RPM Weather, currents, draft, route and scheduled arrival time. RPM Optimizer calculates a more efficient propulsion setting. Engine RPM can be adjusted to support voyage efficiency. Crew monitors propulsion and voyage requirements. Automated Control
Voyage Optimization Route, environmental conditions and arrival requirements. Continuously evaluates route and speed efficiency. Navigation and propulsion commands can be coordinated. Bridge team remains part of the operating loop. AI + Automation
Low Visibility Radar, AIS and infrared camera data supplement optical imagery. Sensor fusion continues identifying surrounding targets. System continues operating while its sensor limits are satisfied. Crew remains responsible for determining whether conditions are safe. Condition Based
System Limitation Sensor quality, weather and operating conditions. Alerts operators when operating conditions exceed system capability. Control can be returned to bridge personnel. Human operators take control. Human Takeover
Command Authority Full vessel operating situation. HiNAS performs defined automated navigation functions only when engaged. Automated actions remain subject to bridge supervision. Master retains final authority over the vessel. Master Retains Control
Crew Requirement Normal navigational watchkeeping requirements. Reduces workload on selected repetitive navigation functions. Vessel remains conventionally crewed. Certified officer maintains a safe navigational watch. Crew Remains
Do not confuse two different “Level 2” definitions

Avikus uses Level 2 to describe its automated navigation technology. IMO's historic Degree Two MASS terminology described a remotely controlled vessel with seafarers onboard. The CIDO announcement does not say these ships will be remotely operated from shore.

Construction has already started

Korean Register recorded steel cutting for the first CIDO 7,600-CEU dual-fuel PCTC at CMHI Jiangsu on April 13, 2026.

PCTC Autonomous Navigation Savings Model

Test how a small voyage-efficiency improvement scales across 20 ships, then compare it with the potential 32-vessel program.

20 contracted ships plus the 12-vessel deployment framework.
User-adjustable planning assumption, not a published CIDO figure.
Default uses the maximum saving reported during Hyundai Glovis' earlier PCTC HiNAS pilot. It is not a forecast for CIDO.
Editable scenario value. Actual LNG and pilot-fuel economics will vary.
20-Ship Fuel Saved
8,190 t
Annual fleet-equivalent saving under selected assumptions
20-Ship Fuel Value
$5.32M
Gross annual avoided fuel expenditure
Value per Vessel
$266K
Indicative annual gross value per ship
5-Year Gross Value
$26.62M
Assumes unchanged fuel, utilization and performance
32-Ship Fuel Saved
13,104 t
Potential expanded deployment scenario
32-Ship Fuel Value
$8.52M
Gross annual value at selected fuel price
Annual Gross Fuel-Value Comparison
20 ships
$5.32M
32 ships
$8.52M
Scenario model only. CIDO has not published expected fuel savings, vessel fuel consumption, subscription pricing or project ROI. The default 3.9% efficiency input comes from a separate Hyundai Glovis PCTC HiNAS Control pilot and should not be treated as expected performance for these newbuilds. Actual results will depend on route, speed, weather, traffic, vessel loading, LNG operating mode and bridge use.
Feedback Welcome

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements.

Please click here to get in touch
By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact