HomeBlack Sea Attacks Push Russian Grain North to Baltic and Arctic Ports

Black Sea Attacks Push Russian Grain North to Baltic and Arctic Ports

September 22, 2026

🔔 Subscribe to ShipUniverse Weekly →

Russian grain exporters are rapidly shifting cargo away from their traditional southern gateways after a series of Ukrainian drone attacks damaged terminals and grain-carrying vessels around Novorossiysk, Tuapse and the Sea of Azov. In the 2025-26 export season, Russia shipped 46.3 million tonnes of grain through Black Sea and Azov ports, nearly 90% of its seaborne grain exports. That dependence is now being reduced through Ust-Luga, Vysotsk and newly converted terminals in St. Petersburg, while the Arctic port of Murmansk is preparing to begin grain exports in October. Ust-Luga's Ultramar terminal, previously focused on fertilizer, received rail applications for about 260,000 tonnes of grain in September, while Russian Railways has approved the first 40,000-tonne grain movement from Stavropol to Murmansk. The shift is substantial, but northern capacity remains far smaller than the southern system it is being asked to replace.

Russian Grain Logistics · September 2026

Russia's Export Map Is Moving North

A grain system built around deepwater Black Sea terminals is being reconfigured around longer rail movements, Baltic bulk terminals and, for the first time, a meaningful Arctic export option.

SOUTHERN CORRIDOR DISRUPTED

Black Sea & Azov

46.3M t grain exported last season

Nearly 90% of Russia's seaborne grain exports moved through the southern system. Repeated attacks on terminals and grain vessels have reduced loadings and made shipowners increasingly reluctant to call.

→
PRIMARY REROUTING ZONE

Baltic Ports

260K t Ultramar rail requests in September

Ust-Luga, Vysotsk and St. Petersburg are taking cargo that previously moved south. Fertilizer and general-cargo terminals are being modified to accept grain without waiting for purpose-built new terminals.

→
NEW ARCTIC OPTION

Murmansk

40K t first approved rail shipment

The year-round ice-free port plans to begin grain exports in October. Its ability to handle Panamax-class vessels gives exporters a large-ship outlet far from the Black Sea conflict zone.

July-August Grain Exports 4.4M t
Down about 31% from the same period a year earlier.
September Forecast 2.45M t
Sovecon estimate, approximately 50% below September 2025.
Russian Baltic Grain Capacity 2-7M t
Analyst estimates vary considerably depending on which terminals and converted facilities are included.
Southern Port Capacity >60M t
The scale of the southern system remains far greater than the current northern alternatives.
This is not a one-for-one port substitution
Grain can be physically redirected north, but every diverted tonne must first move thousands of kilometers across Russia by rail before reaching Baltic or Arctic terminals. Storage, rail slots, wagon availability and berth handling therefore become part of the maritime capacity calculation.
2,700 km
Murmansk vs Novorossiysk Approximate distance between Russia's emerging Arctic grain gateway and its principal southern export hub.
Port Conversion Board

The Grain Cargo Is Entering Ports Built for Other Commodities

Russia's immediate answer is not a new generation of grain terminals. It is adapting existing fertilizer, coal and general-cargo infrastructure while shifting rail capacity toward the northwest and Arctic.

Scroll sideways for the complete port comparison ← →
Port / Terminal Previous Role Current Grain Signal Ship / Cargo Capability Commercial Advantage Main Limitation
Novorossiysk DISRUPTED Russia's dominant deepwater grain export gateway. NKHP and NZT were damaged in the August 12 attack and suspended operations. Other terminals continued only at reduced pace. Large deepwater bulkers and established high-volume grain handling. Short rail distance from major southern producing regions and established grain storage, inspection and loading infrastructure. Attack risk, terminal damage, vessel availability and rapidly rising insurance and freight costs.
Ust-Luga · Ultramar CONVERTED Large fertilizer terminal. Ultramar exported about 16 million tonnes of fertilizer last year. Began handling grain in August. September rail applications reached roughly 260,000 tonnes, including grain destined for Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Large modern bulk-handling complex with significant unused terminal capacity. Existing conveyors, berths and rail infrastructure allow grain exports to start without building a completely new facility. Grain must travel much farther by rail from southern production regions, increasing inland cost and rail-network pressure.
Vysotsk GRAIN ACTIVE Baltic deepwater bulk port with existing dedicated grain infrastructure. Russian Grain Union data put first-ten-days-of-September grain shipments at about 95,000 tonnes. Deepwater terminal suitable for larger dry-bulk vessels. Unlike the newly converted terminals, Vysotsk already has a grain-export operating chain. Baltic capacity remains too small to absorb volumes normally shipped through the south.
St. Petersburg NEW GRAIN CARGO Modul and BSMZ previously handled other cargoes rather than bulk grain exports. Both terminals are now accepting grain. Modul is reported capable of handling up to 70,000 tonnes per month in containers. Containerized and multipurpose cargo handling. Rapid capacity addition without waiting for purpose-built grain elevators and shiploaders. Containerized grain is generally more expensive than conventional bulk export logistics.
Murmansk ARCTIC ENTRY Coal, ore and metals export port with total port capacity of up to 24 million tonnes annually. Grain exports are expected to start in October. The first 40,000-tonne rail delivery from Stavropol has been approved. Can accommodate Panamax-class ships and is ice-free year round. Provides access to the Atlantic through northern waters and moves grain away from the Black Sea security zone. The producing region-to-port rail haul is extremely long and there is not yet an established large-scale grain terminal system comparable with Novorossiysk.
Black Sea → Egypt ~$70 / t
Freight level cited by Russian grain traders during the August vessel-attack surge.
VS
Baltic → Egypt ~$48 / t
Indicative Baltic freight cited by S&P Global on August 20.
The insurance map also changed: London's Joint War Committee widened its designated high-risk area in September to cover the entire Black Sea. That does not stop commercial voyages, but it increases underwriting scrutiny and can raise war-risk costs for ships operating there.
Ship Universe Grain Logistics Tool

Black Sea Replacement Capacity Analyzer

Test how much northern export capacity would be required if part of Russia's 46.3-million-tonne Black Sea and Azov grain flow had to be permanently rerouted.

M tonnes / year
Default uses 2025-26 Black Sea and Azov grain exports.
%
M tonnes / year
Uses the upper end of the currently reported 2-7 million tonne estimate.
M tonnes / year
Scenario input. No consolidated annual grain capacity has yet been published for the newly converted terminals.
M tonnes / year
Scenario input. Murmansk is only beginning grain operations, so no established annual grain throughput is assumed.
tonnes
Annual Volume Needing Rerouting 23.15M southern baseline multiplied by entered diversion share
Entered Northern Capacity 7.0M Baltic plus converted-terminal and Arctic assumptions
Remaining Capacity Gap 16.15M rerouting requirement not covered by entered northern capacity
Northern Coverage 30.2% entered northern capacity versus rerouting requirement
Uncovered Panamax Cargoes 269 remaining tonnage divided by entered vessel parcel
Baltic vs Full Southern Baseline 15.1% Russian Baltic capacity as a share of the historical southern flow
Capacity Replacement
The gap widens rapidly as a larger share of traditional Black Sea volume needs a northern outlet.
Volume Needing New Route 23.15M t
Entered Northern Capacity 7.0M t
Current Scenario 50% Diversion
The model separates confirmed existing Baltic grain capacity from speculative future capacity. Add converted-terminal or Arctic capacity only when you want to test a ramp-up scenario.
Southern Base 46.3M t
Russian Baltic 7.0M t
Converted 0M t
Arctic 0M t
Capacity caution: The 46.3-million-tonne baseline is historical 2025-26 Black Sea and Azov export volume. The 7-million-tonne Baltic figure is the upper end of current estimates for Russian Baltic grain-handling capacity. Murmansk's total port capacity is much larger, but it is not the same as grain capacity, so the model deliberately assumes zero Arctic grain capacity until the user enters a scenario.
Feedback Welcome

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements.

Please click here to get in touch
By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact