FuelEU Maritime Readiness Scorecard (2025–2030)

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter

FuelEU Maritime is tightening from 2025 to 2030, and the practical questions are simple: what fuels can you credibly use, how efficient is each vessel, which clauses protect you, and what proof do you have on file? This scorecard gives a quick, defensible read on those levers, showing your tier, a rough compliance margin, and the top fixes worth doing now. Use it to align technical, chartering, and finance before costs creep in.

1️⃣ What “Readiness” Means

It’s not a yes/no. Readiness = lowest-cost compliance with commercial flexibility. Blend: fuel pathways, ship efficiency, contracts, and evidence.

Fuel PathwayOps DisciplineContract CoverAudit Proof
Your scorecard rolls these into one signal you can share across technical, chartering, and finance.

2️⃣ Inputs to Have Ready

  • Fleet list + baselines
  • Fuel mix by lane/season
  • Key charter clauses
  • MRV/WtW evidence path

3️⃣ Moving Pieces (2025→2030)

  • Tightening targets—don’t back-load action
  • Fuel availability & price spread swings
  • Well-to-wake tracking, audit scrutiny
Plan to pivot without losing discipline.

4️⃣ Where the Money Moves

  • Tech/ops: speed, trim, routing, retrofits
  • Pathway arbitrage: availability × price × claims
  • Clauses: penalty sharing & flexibility
The scorecard flags quick wins vs capex moves.

5️⃣ Readiness Tiers

  • Tier A: evidence-ready & flexible
  • Tier B: partial cover, close gaps
  • Tier C: reactive, high audit/penalty risk

6️⃣ What You’ll Get

  • Headline readiness score + tier
  • Compliance margin vs target (beta)
  • Priority fixes (fast / strategic)
Next: the interactive scorecard with scoped print & export.

Planning Signal — Not a Legal Compliance Calculator

This widget provides a readiness score and a rough compliance margin based on editable assumptions below. It does not constitute a regulatory determination. Confirm with your verifier and replace “beta” targets/factors in code with official values.


FuelEU Readiness — Inputs (2025–2030)

Voyage scope (exposure weighting)
These should total ≈ 100%. Exposure weighting applies to compliance/penalty bands.
Use a blended proxy for current EEXI/CII/ops discipline.
MRV/verification processes, evidence trails, WtW tracking.
Contract & commercial levers
Fuel pathway mix — % of energy Must sum ≈ 100%
Weights & “beta” factors are in code comments for your team to replace with official values when ready.

Readiness Result

Tier —
Year: 2025
Headline signalRun the calculation.
Priority fixes
NotesUse this as an internal planning signal. Evidence checklist lives in your data room.
Readiness weights: Fuel pathway fit (40%), ops/technical (25%), contract cover (20%), data integrity (15%).

Compliance Margin vs Target (beta factors)

Fleet GHG intensity (beta WtW index)
Target for year
Compliance margin
Exposure-weighted penalty band
“Beta” WtW indices and year targets below are placeholders for planning. Replace with official tables in code when you’re ready.

How to read this

You’ll see two signals: (1) a readiness score (commercial & audit posture) and (2) a compliance margin vs a year target (beta). Tier A ≈ evidence-ready & flexible; Tier B ≈ partial gaps; Tier C ≈ reactive. Use “Priority fixes” to triage fast moves vs capex-heavy items.

Bottom line: use this scorecard as a planning signal to line up fuel pathway choices, ops discipline, contract cover, and evidence, then sanity-check the output against your verifier’s rules. Run a quick first pass for each fleet segment and lane mix, note the gaps, and turn the top two fixes into actions you can execute this quarter. Revisit the inputs monthly as prices, availability, and targets shift so the “readiness” signal stays current. If a result surprises you, treat it as an audit prompt: pull the docs you’d need to prove it and see what’s missing.

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.
By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact