🔔 Subscribe to ShipUniverse Weekly →
The Malta-flagged product tanker Agioi Fanendes changed course off the U.S. East Coast after carrying approximately 40,000 metric tonnes of Russian ultra-low-sulfur diesel across the Atlantic from Primorsk. The vessel had initially indicated New York as its destination, with an expected arrival on November 7, but shipping data showed it slowing and maneuvering roughly 400 nautical miles offshore instead of entering port. On November 10, its Greek manager, Eastern Mediterranean Maritime (Eastmed), confirmed that the vessel was still awaiting orders and that no discharge port had been finalized. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said the cargo could be sold through another port, while New Jersey authorities and members of Congress continued challenging the legality of importing Russian diesel under a new Treasury authorization.
40,000 Tonnes of Diesel. No Confirmed U.S. Discharge Port.
A Russian-origin cargo shipped from Primorsk has reached the western Atlantic, but its carrier has not completed the originally indicated New York delivery.
IMO 9798375 | Malta-flagged
2019-built medium-range oil / chemical tanker
49,996 DWT | 183.06 metres long
Listed owner: Maltatankers Shipping Ltd
Listed class: Lloyd's Register
Listed P&I club: Britannia
Manager's published particulars, not live certificate verification
The Voyage and Regulatory Timeline
The vessel's movements and the official government decisions form two interconnected timelines.
OFAC authorizes certain Russian-origin diesel transactions, expressly including importation into the United States under specified sanctions regulations.
LSEG shipping data places approximately 40,000 metric tonnes of ultra-low-sulfur diesel aboard the vessel.
Senator Richard Blumenthal publishes a letter directed to Eastmed regarding the vessel's prospective U.S. discharge.
Governor Mikie Sherrill challenges the legality of unloading Russian fuel, citing the 2022 federal import ban.
The earlier New York ETA is not fulfilled. It had been a vessel-tracking indication, not proof of a terminal berth or sales contract.
Shipping intelligence reports the tanker approximately 400 nautical miles from New York, maneuvering or moving away from the coast.
Eastmed confirms the vessel remains awaiting orders. Secretary Chris Wright says the diesel is expected to find a destination elsewhere.
One Russian Diesel Cargo. Two Different Federal Authorities.
A temporary Treasury authorization and a congressional import ban have created an unresolved dispute with direct implications for petroleum terminals and cargo counterparties.
Compare the Actual Legal Instruments
The documents below are official. Their interaction remains contested and should not be decided by treating an OFAC license as a blanket waiver of every applicable law.
31 CFR Part 587 and Part 589, the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities and Ukraine/Russia-related sanctions regulations.
Transactions expressly describedSale, delivery, offloading and importation of Russian-origin diesel, expressly including importation into the United States.
Published durationThrough 12:01 a.m. Eastern daylight time on April 7, 2027.
Important express exclusionDoes not authorize certain debits to U.S. bank accounts held by specified Russian sovereign institutions.
Prohibits the importation of Russian-origin energy products under Chapter 27 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
Termination mechanismProvides for a presidential certification to Congress addressing Russian withdrawal and other conditions.
Congressional processIncludes a 90-calendar-day period and an opportunity for a joint resolution of disapproval.
Unresolved issueWhether the temporary OFAC authorization can lawfully permit these imports without satisfying the statutory provisions.
The Dispute in the Public Record
Treasury published the general license, and the administration maintains that the import authorization complies with applicable law. Energy Secretary Chris Wright says Russian diesel may be sold elsewhere in world markets.
Governor Mikie Sherrill and lawmakers argue that a temporary regulatory license cannot bypass the prohibition Congress enacted in 2022 without satisfying required legal conditions.
Where the Uncertainty Enters the Shipping Chain
The practical concerns below arise from the reported case. They are not findings that any specific party committed a violation.
| Participant | Operational Requirement | Unanswered Question | Possible Commercial Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vessel Manager | Obtain lawful, workable voyage orders and discharge arrangements. | Has a final destination been nominated and accepted by all relevant counterparties? | More vessel time, changed voyage instructions and disputed time costs. |
| Charterer / Trader | Secure lawful cargo sale and carriage arrangements. | Which import restrictions, counterparties and contract conditions apply? | Destination substitution, price renegotiation or additional due diligence. |
| Petroleum Terminal | Accept only cargoes compatible with applicable law, terminal terms and approvals. | Is the proposed discharge legally permitted and operationally accepted? | Berth refusal or delayed discharge if legal or contractual approval is absent. |
| Customs / Regulators | Apply relevant import rules and any lawful exemptions. | How do GL 135 and the 2022 congressional statute interact? | Entry uncertainty and a possible need for further formal clarification. |
| Bank / Insurer | Evaluate payment legality, coverage terms and cargo-related restrictions. | Do the applicable policies and payment arrangements accept the proposed transaction? | Documentation holds, additional review or refusal of financial services. |
| Alternative Buyer | Assess local import rules and the new destination's commercial requirements. | Will another destination accept the cargo, at what price and with what incremental voyage cost? | Rerouting expense and possible cargo-price adjustment. |
OFAC published GL 135 on October 9 with defined regulatory scope.
New Jersey's November 2 letter challenges Russian diesel imports under the 2022 statute.
No definitive judicial ruling or completed discharge under the disputed arrangement was identified.
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements.
Please click here to get in touch