Your Ship Is in the Black Sea. AIS Says It Is in Peru: Inside Maritime’s 12,000-km Navigation Problem
🔔 Subscribe to ShipUniverse Weekly →
The 12,129-Kilometre AIS Error
Four vessels off Bulgaria transmitted 27 AIS positions placing them inside the same small area of Lima. A terrestrial receiver in Varna heard the transmissions locally. The ships had not crossed the Atlantic. Their position data had.
A vessel can transmit a perfectly valid AIS radio message containing a completely invalid position. That appears to be the central lesson from a September incident detected off Bulgaria.
The receiver location makes the anomaly unusually easy to diagnose. Terrestrial AIS is short-range VHF. If a shore receiver in Varna hears the transmission directly, the transmitter has to be somewhere within terrestrial radio reach, not 12,000 kilometres away in Lima.
But a 12,129-kilometre error is almost too obvious. The harder navigation problem begins when the false position moves only far enough to remain believable.
The radio signal and the position field tell two different stories
This is what makes terrestrial AIS reception useful for integrity checking. The radio has its own physical geography.
Receiver says Black Sea
A nearby terrestrial VHF receiver directly heard the vessels' AIS broadcasts.
AIS position says Peru
The position embedded in the received messages was roughly 12,129 kilometres from the ships' operating area.
The bad coordinate can enter AIS before the radio ever transmits
AIS depends on positioning information supplied by GNSS or another approved position source. Once that source is wrong, the AIS radio can accurately broadcast the wrong answer.
Simplified corruption path
Position source → shore displayGNSS signal
Receiver accepts misleading position or timing information.
Ship position source
False coordinates become an apparently valid ship position.
AIS transponder
AIS incorporates the position into its normal outgoing message.
VHF transmission
The radio broadcasts normally from the vessel's real physical area.
Tracking platform
The impossible coordinate may be displayed, flagged or removed as an outlier.
Lima is the easy case. A believable lie is harder.
The following scale is an operational illustration, not a universal alarm threshold. The point is that spectacular errors are easier for people and software to reject than plausible ones.
Obviously impossible
A tanker heard by a Bulgarian terrestrial receiver cannot simultaneously be transmitting VHF from Lima.
Operationally suspicious
Radar, coastlines, expected track and nearby traffic should make a displacement of this scale apparent quickly.
Potentially believable
The displayed ship may still appear to be in the correct general channel, anchorage or traffic area.
Small enough to trust
Near shoals, traffic lanes or port approaches, a plausible error can matter more than a spectacular teleport.
GNSS is not one screen on the bridge
Modern ships distribute position and precise time into systems far beyond a standalone GPS receiver. A spoofed position can therefore become a vessel-wide data-integrity problem.
ECDIS, radar and track control
Electronic navigation equipment may consume GNSS position, speed or timing directly or indirectly.
AIS
False position data can be redistributed to other vessels and shore receivers.
GMDSS and distress systems
Distress equipment can depend on GNSS position or timing when creating emergency information.
LRIT and satellite services
Position and time can also feed long-range reporting and connected communications equipment.
DP and automated functions
Position-dependent automation requires particular attention when GNSS integrity becomes uncertain.
VDR, clocks and digital logs
Incorrect position or timing can contaminate records used later to reconstruct an event.
One position should never win just because it is digital
The workload rises even when the bridge detects the problem correctly
Navigation falls back to people
GNSS interference does not only create a position error. It forces bridge teams to replace automated certainty with cross-checking, manual fixes, additional watchkeeping and sometimes changes to the vessel's operating plan.
When the screens disagree, rebuild position from independent evidence
Navigation Position Trust Console
Start with the Lima event or build a more subtle scenario. The model asks whether the AIS coordinate agrees with the physical radio geometry and independent navigation evidence.
Would you trust this coordinate?
The tool separates AIS message validity from position validity and shows how far a suspect GNSS input could propagate through a digitally integrated vessel.
The encoded coordinate conflicts with both radio geometry and independent physical evidence.
Cross-check radar, visual or terrestrial position information, maintain appropriate bridge resource management, verify which systems consume the suspect GNSS feed and report interference through applicable operational channels.
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements.
Please click here to get in touch