15 Major Shipping Incidents in H1 2025

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter
From blazing vehicle carriers in the Pacific to oil tanker collisions in geopolitically tense waters, the first half of 2025 has tested the global shipping industry’s resilience. As maritime trade volumes continue to surge, so too do the risks, from onboard fires and navigation failures to acts of piracy and port explosions.
This isn't just about isolated accidents, it's a warning signal for regulators, insurers, and shipowners worldwide. In this report, we break down 15 of the most serious shipping incidents so far this year, with a look at the causes, consequences, and what they reveal about the state of global maritime safety.
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.
- The total loss of cargo and vessel highlights growing risks tied to EV battery fires at sea.
- Salvage teams were unable to board due to high temperatures and structural damage, delaying pollution response.
- This case may trigger new insurance models and tighter EV stowage regulations for car carriers.
- Fire suppression systems on many ships are not designed to contain lithium-ion battery fires.
- New safety protocols may include segregated EV loading zones and water mist suppression systems.
- Port authorities and underwriters are closely watching how future EV shipping contracts are structured.
Bottom Line: The Morning Midas disaster has sparked an urgent conversation about how prepared the maritime industry truly is for the EV shipping boom.
- This incident shows that anchored vessels still face major collision risks in poor visibility conditions.
- Investigators are examining failures in radar monitoring, bridge watch protocols, and emergency response.
- The collision led to criminal charges, oil spill containment efforts, and temporary shipping restrictions in the area.
- Claims could exceed $100 million, affecting insurers and shipowners on both sides.
- Maritime authorities stress the need for clear visibility procedures, even for stationary vessels.
- Ship operators are being urged to review fog protocols, radar alarms, and bridge staffing requirements.
Bottom Line: One avoidable mistake in foggy waters led to fire, loss, and international investigations. This case is a wake-up call to never let anchor status replace active situational awareness.
- Vessel carried over 2,000 tonnes of fuel plus at least 157 containers holding hazardous goods (explosives, corrosives, flammables).
- Explosives not listed on manifest but confirmed onboard, raising questions about cargo declaration.
- Multiple containers lost overboard, triggering concerns over pollution and marine debris washing ashore.
- Firefighting response involved naval ships, helicopters, and salvage teams, reflecting need for multi-agency coordination.
- Local police filed criminal negligence charges against operator, captain, and crew under Indian maritime safety laws.
- Salvors face challenges towing and extinguishing blaze amid drift, high seas, and hazardous cargo.
Bottom Line: The Wan Hai 503 incident underlines how undeclared explosives and hazardous cargo can escalate routine fires into full-blown crises, spotlighting gaps in cargo transparency and emergency preparedness at sea.
- Fuel and chemicals entered sensitive fishing grounds, damaging marine ecosystems and livelihoods.
- Calcium carbide's reaction with seawater released flammable gases, complicating cleanup efforts.
- Containers were scattered across the sea and several washed ashore, posing ongoing risks to coastal communities.
- Authorities implemented a 20 nautical mile fishing exclusion zone while cleanup and containment efforts began.
- Investigations are focusing on cargo misdeclaration and improper weight distribution contributing to instability.
- Regional ports are now reviewing hazard labeling and loading protocols for outbound vessels.
Bottom Line: The MSC Elsa 3 disaster demonstrates how quickly an unstable load and undeclared hazardous cargo can escalate into an environmental emergency with lasting damage to regional economies and ecosystems.
- Mechanical failure amid strong currents can lead to rapid loss of control in dense urban waterways.
- Tall-masted ships face unique clearance hazards, especially under bridges.
- The high number of personnel onboard amplified the impact of even minor technical failures.
- Training vessels should incorporate redundant propulsion systems or immediate-stop protocols in restricted waters.
- Urban maritime operations demand stricter power-loss drills and bridge clearance planning.
- Cruise and training ship operators may face renewed calls for enhanced crew safety systems during port maneuvers.
Bottom Line: The Cuauhtémoc collision underscores how even routine port departures can become deadly when mechanical failures meet urban constraints. Safety drills and backup systems are non-negotiable in these environments.
- High-traffic strategic chokepoint raised collision risk under tight vessel spacing.
- Escalating regional tensions may be contributing to navigational errors or reduced situational awareness.
- Rapid ignition of cargo emphasizes vulnerability of product tankers in tilting and impact scenarios.
- Strait traffic management plans are under review to enhance vessel separation and route clarity.
- Operators are increasing bridge watch resources and investing in redundant navigation equipment.
- Insurers are reassessing risk premiums for tankers passing through politically sensitive regions.
Bottom Line: The Strait of Hormuz collision highlights the challenge of managing safe operations in dense, geopolitically fraught waters. It underscores the need for strict traffic control and vigilance to avoid potentially catastrophic tanker incidents.
- Improper storage and mislabeling of chemicals—including oxidizers used in missile fuel—can spark chain reactions in ports handling mixed dangerous goods.
- The blast damaged infrastructure central to Iran’s trade and oil exports, disrupting maritime supply chains.
- A delayed response and media restrictions fueled concerns about transparency in emergency management.
- Port authorities worldwide must review chemical handling, segregation, and container stacking practices.
- Emergency services need training for large-scale industrial blasts near civilian areas.
- Insurance and liability models for ports handling high-risk cargo may be renegotiated in response.
Bottom Line: The explosion at Shahid Rajaee is a stark reminder that ports storing mixed hazardous cargo require extreme diligence, strong safety culture, and effective emergency transparency to prevent catastrophic loss of life and trade disruption.
- Electronic interference can mislead navigation systems, increasing collision hazards.
- Reliance on GPS/AIS without backup systems leaves vessels vulnerable in conflict zones.
- Unsupported jamming events can strand vessels or force rerouting, disrupting schedules and costs.
- Shipping operators are restarting manual navigation protocols and using radar and compasses.
- Night-time transits are being avoided; many are delaying departures until GPS stability returns.
- Insurers and charterers are recalibrating risk premiums and voyage clauses for vessels in the area.
Bottom Line: GPS jamming in the Strait of Hormuz shows how electronic warfare tactics can degrade basic maritime safety. It underlines the need for backup navigation, updated voyage plans, and higher vigilance in high-risk zones.
- Increase in EV-related fires and undeclared hazardous cargo contributed to flare-ups at sea.
- Vital salvage and firefighting resources are being stretched thin across multiple simultaneous crises.
- The rise in incidents reflects deeper issues with cargo transparency, vessel maintenance, and route planning.
- Salvage companies are urging fleet operators to adopt proactive emergency preparedness and risk assessments.
- Major insurers are warning of premium hikes and stricter cargo declarations tied to hazardous materials.
- Port states and flag administrations are reviewing safety protocols for live-fire drills, stability checks, and container scanning.
Bottom Line: The surge in Q2 maritime incidents shows that routine global supply chains now increasingly intersect with high-risk cargo and complex operational zones—requiring a sharp shift in industry risk management and infrastructure readiness.
- The surge in Asia, particularly the Singapore Straits, highlights overcrowding, low vigilance, and easy access for attackers.
- Armed gangs are increasingly targeting crew and vessels, reporting cases of firearms use, hostage-taking, and hijacking attempts.
- Global hotspots now include the Singapore Straits, Gulf of Guinea, Somali basin, and parts of Southeast Asia.
- Ship operators are adopting BMP standards and boosting crew security measures in high-risk areas.
- Insurance underwriters may impose stricter risk assessments and higher premiums for transits through troubled zones.
- Regional maritime authorities are enhancing patrols and coordination to counter the rise in incidents.
Bottom Line: The Q1 piracy surge shows maritime security remains fragile. Escalating incidents demand stronger protection measures, vigilant crews, and international cooperation to protect ships and seafarers.
- Nonmilitary vessels engaged in scientific work are now exposed to coercive tactics in contested maritime zones.
- Harassed ships face threats to crew safety, mission integrity, and scientific data collection.
- The behavior hints at escalating gray-zone conflicts without triggering full military responses.
- Flag states and vessel operators are increasing surveillance, liaison, and incident reporting protocols.
- Some governments are advocating for escorting civilian survey vessels with coast guard ships in contested zones.
- Regional maritime law clarity and diplomatic pressure are being sought to curb civilian harassment at sea.
Bottom Line: The civilian maritime harassment incidents in early 2025 signal that geopolitical tensions are spilling over into civilian maritime operations. Survey and research missions now face deliberate disruption tactics that require legal, diplomatic, and security mitigation measures.
- Lack of clear port refuge protocols can leave damaged vessels adrift and at risk of grounding.
- Authorities may delay entry to mitigate pollution risk, worsening the vessel's condition during standoff periods.
- Pandemic-port infrastructure may not be ready to handle emergency cargo ships carrying hazardous goods.
- Port states need clear, pre-defined refuge protocols that balance environmental safety with vessel aid.
- Charterers and salvors must negotiate port entry terms quickly in emergency scenarios.
- Damage-control teams emphasize real-time cooperation among insurers, ports, and shipowners.
Bottom Line: The grounding of Wan Hai 503 illustrates how the absence of port refuge procedures can worsen maritime emergencies. It highlights the need for ready frameworks to assist distressed vessels before further incidents occur.
- Older vessels in the ‘shadow fleet’ are driving maintenance-related failures.
- Fires often stem from aging machinery, poor maintenance or undeclared hazardous goods like lithium batteries.
- Simultaneous incidents across regions are stretching firefighting and salvage capacity.
- Owners are facing pressure to invest in maintenance, machinery upgrades, and early fault detection systems.
- Insurers are tightening maintenance clauses and cargo declarations amid rising claim volumes.
- Flag states and port authorities are ramping up inspections, especially for older, high-risk vessels.
Bottom Line: The surge in early‑2025 machinery and fire incidents shows that aging fleet components and undeclared cargo remain high-risk triggers. Industry-wide upgrades in maintenance standards and risk detection are now imperative.
- The breadth of alerts shows that multiple risk vectors remain active across different vessel classes and trades.
- Many alerts focus on repeat issues such as EV battery fires, inadequate stability checks, and fire control deficiencies.
- The increasing frequency of alerts signals that oversight alone is not reducing incident recurrence.
- Operators are urged to review all safety alerts proactively and adjust internal procedures without waiting for flag state enforcement.
- Manufacturers and shipyards are being asked to align with updated safety circulars when delivering vessels and systems.
- Industry groups recommend using safety alerts as training tools in crew drills and onboarding processes.
Bottom Line: The volume of IMO and Seatrade alerts in early 2025 makes one thing clear: routine safety issues are still hurting shipping. Proactive review and training using these alerts could save lives and vessels before another incident hits.
The first half of 2025 has exposed serious cracks in the global maritime system. Fires, collisions, groundings, and geopolitical threats have not only disrupted trade but also raised urgent questions about preparedness, safety standards, and operational discipline. These incidents are not outliers. They reflect patterns tied to aging fleets, poor cargo oversight, and gaps in emergency response.
What happens next will depend on how quickly the industry adapts. Better port access for damaged vessels, stricter cargo controls, and more proactive crew training are no longer optional. The risks are clear. The cost of ignoring them will only grow.