5 Proven Hull Coatings and one Awesome Built-In ROI Calculator

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter

In this report, we are breaking down the 5 proven hull coatings that shipowners use today. No marketing fluff. Just real-world options that protect against fouling and help you stay profitable. Whether you operate a coastal vessel or a long-range trader, we show which coatings perform, what they cost, and how they compare.

To make this report truly practical, we have included a built-in ROI calculator. It lets you estimate your coating costs, projected fuel savings, dry dock intervals, and return on investment based on your specific vessel and trade pattern. You can finally compare options not just by theory, but by real payback.

1️⃣ CDP Antifouling Coating

We’re starting with CDP coatings because they’re among the most widely used options in commercial shipping. They offer a good balance of cost, protection, and flexibility, especially for vessels that stay on the move.

CDP Antifouling Coating Breakdown
Factor	Details	Typical Range	Best Fit Vessels	Cautions
Coating Type	Controlled Depletion Polymer (CDP)	—	Short-sea cargo, feeder vessels, coastal tankers	Not ideal for vessels with long idle periods
Cost (Applied)	Includes coating, prep, and labor	$4.50–$7.50 per m²	Vessels needing frequent drydocking	May increase total lifecycle cost over 5 years
Lifespan	Erodes gradually as ship sails	12–36 months	Active vessels with port calls every 1–2 weeks	Recoating required more often than advanced options
Fuel Efficiency Gain	Maintains clean hull longer than no coating	3–5% on average	Ships operating below 15 knots	Diminishes quickly if vessel slows or anchors
Dry Dock Interval Impact	Usually aligns with 2–2.5 year cycles	18–30 months	Vessels with regular trade routes and port schedules	Not suited for extended voyages or offshore storage
ROI Profile	Lower upfront cost, modest long-term savings	Break-even in 1–2 years	Budget-conscious operators with consistent trade	Not cost-effective for 4–5 year intervals
Key Competitors	SPC, Silicone, Foul Release Coatings	—	Operators with a need to upgrade later	Shorter intervals may offset initial savings
Note: All values based on global market averages and application pricing for ships between 10,000–80,000 DWT. ROI varies depending on route, vessel age, and fuel prices.

---

2️⃣ SPC Antifouling Coating

We’ve found that SPC coatings are a strong step up from CDP when it comes to consistent biocide release and performance. For vessels with predictable schedules and moderate speeds, SPC can provide a smoother hull over a longer service life.

SPC Antifouling Coating Breakdown
Factor	Details	Typical Range	Best Fit Vessels	Cautions
Coating Type	Self-Polishing Copolymer (SPC)	—	Container ships, tankers, LNG carriers	Deactivation risk if idle too long
Cost (Applied)	Includes coating, prep, and labor	$6.50–$11.00 per m²	Ships with regular 3–5 year drydock cycle	Higher initial cost vs. CDP
Lifespan	Chemical polishing via hydrolysis reaction	36–60 months	Deep-sea vessels, consistent sailing speed	May underperform with low activity
Fuel Efficiency Gain	Smooth hull reduces drag significantly	4–7% on average	Vessels sailing at 12–20 knots	Requires proper hull prep for max benefit
Dry Dock Interval Impact	Matches 3–5 year maintenance planning	36–60 months	Ocean-crossing routes and scheduled drydocks	Not flexible for short charter contracts
ROI Profile	Higher upfront, but strong long-term value	Break-even in 2–3 years	Fleet operators optimizing fuel & drydock costs	Not ideal for operators with high idle rates
Key Competitors	CDP, Silicone, Foul Release Coatings	—	Fleets with structured long-haul schedules	Overkill for low-speed, short-haul vessels
Note: All values based on global market averages and application pricing for vessels 10,000–100,000 DWT. ROI outcomes depend on fuel prices, operating time, and sailing patterns.

---

3️⃣ Copper-Free Antifouling Coating

We’re seeing more shipowners explore copper-free options, especially those operating in environmentally sensitive regions or facing stricter port regulations. These coatings aim to reduce ecological impact without sacrificing performance.

Copper-Free Antifouling Coating Breakdown
Factor	Details	Typical Range	Best Fit Vessels	Cautions
Coating Type	Copper-free biocide or slick-surface fouling release	—	Ships operating in green ports or emission zones	May need strict cleaning routines in high fouling zones
Cost (Applied)	Premium pricing reflects eco-friendly tech	$8.00–$13.00 per m²	Owners seeking port access compliance	Costly if benefits aren’t required by local law
Lifespan	Resists buildup over longer intervals	36–60 months	Long-haul vessels in temperate waters	May need cleaning if idle too long
Fuel Efficiency Gain	Low drag surface reduces fuel burn	3–6% on average	Operators chasing ESG + operational ROI	Savings depend on hull condition and speed
Dry Dock Interval Impact	Enables longer intervals between reapplications	3–5 years	Ships with reliable long-term schedules	May require mid-cycle inspections
ROI Profile	Higher upfront, long-term savings from fuel + dock	Break-even in 2–3 years	Green-certified fleets, eco charters	Performance drop in tropical fouling zones
Key Competitors	Silicone Foul Release, Hybrid SPC	—	Fleets pursuing long-term environmental compliance	Limited port experience with newer coatings
Note: Figures based on commercial ship coating applications. ROI estimates vary by hull condition, voyage profile, and regulatory pressure.

---

4️⃣ Silicone Foul Release Coating

Silicone foul release coatings don’t kill marine growth, they stop it from sticking. These high-slick coatings create a super-smooth surface that makes it nearly impossible for barnacles, algae, or slime to hold on. When the ship moves, the water pressure helps clean off anything trying to attach.

Silicone Foul Release Coating Breakdown
Factor	Details	Typical Range	Best Fit Vessels	Cautions
Coating Type	Silicone-based foul release (non-biocidal)	—	Fast ferries, container ships, cruise ships	Not ideal for idle or slow-moving vessels
Cost (Applied)	Includes primer, tie coat, silicone topcoat, and labor	$12.00–$18.00 per m²	Operators with longer drydock cycles	Higher upfront cost than conventional coatings
Lifespan	Non-eroding surface lasts until next drydock	Up to 60 months	Ships on regular, active schedules	Can degrade faster if damaged
Fuel Efficiency Gain	Very low surface roughness reduces drag	4–8% average savings	Fast ships operating at higher speeds	Benefit drops if hull fouling begins
Dry Dock Interval Impact	Can align with 5-year cycles	48–60 months	Fleets seeking longer intervals	Repairs can be more complex
ROI Profile	High initial cost, long-term operational savings	Break-even in 2–3 years	Eco-conscious operators, high-speed vessels	ROI depends heavily on vessel utilization
Key Competitors	SPC, Copper-Free, Hybrid Coatings	—	Ships aiming to reduce environmental footprint	Regulatory considerations for biocide-free options
Note: Pricing and performance based on global averages for vessels between 15,000–100,000 DWT. Benefits scale with vessel speed and frequency of use.

---

5️⃣ Hard Coating

We’re wrapping up our list with Hard Coatings, also known as Hard Matrix Antifouling. These coatings are built for durability rather than erosion. They’re often chosen for vessels that operate in abrasive waters or drydock frequently.

Hard Coating Antifouling Breakdown
Factor	Details	Typical Range	Best Fit Vessels	Cautions
Coating Type	Hard Matrix with embedded biocides	—	High-speed ferries, inland vessels, tugboats	No polishing effect; fouling can build up over time
Cost (Applied)	Includes coating, prep, and labor	$3.50–$6.00 per m²	Operators with frequent drydocking	Requires full removal before reapplication
Lifespan	Fixed film; does not erode or polish	24–36 months	Shallow water vessels, river systems	Can lose efficacy without visual cues
Fuel Efficiency Gain	Moderate if kept clean	2–4% potential gain	Fast-moving vessels under 15 knots	Efficiency loss if fouling not removed periodically
Dry Dock Interval Impact	Often applied between frequent intervals	24–30 months	Fleets operating in harsh or abrasive zones	Not optimal for long-term fuel savings
ROI Profile	Cost-effective for rugged environments	Break-even in 1–2 years	Tough-duty operators focused on durability	Inefficient for idle or slow-speed vessels
Key Competitors	CDP, SPC, Foul Release	—	Operators comparing simplicity vs erosion control	Harder to remove when switching coatings
Note: All values based on global market averages and application pricing for commercial hulls between 10,000–60,000 DWT. Performance varies by operating environment and hull maintenance.

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.