VLCC, Capesize, Container: Which Segments Are Really Under-Ordered Going Into 2027?

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter

Orderbook charts in 2025 tell three different stories: VLCCs are finally rebuilding after years of near zero fleet growth, dry bulk (including Capesize) is still relatively disciplined, and container owners are sitting on a record pipeline that could shape rates well into the 2030s. For boards and lenders, the real question is not “is shipping under ordered?” but “which segment still has room to add ships before the next down-cycle hits?”

⏱️ 30 second summary: which segments are really under ordered Quick comparison of VLCC, Capesize and container orderbooks going into 2027.
Snapshot table for board decks and lender briefs

Use this as a one page reference when you explain to stakeholders how very different the supply story looks in crude tankers, dry bulk and containers as deliveries build into 2026–2027.

Segment Orderbook to fleet (approximate) Supply story through 2027 Key board level question
🛢️ VLCC crude tankers Mid teens percent of fleet, with deliveries peaking in 2027. Almost no growth in 2024–2025, then a wave of new ships that mainly renew an ageing fleet. Effective supply is tighter than the headline numbers because many older units trade in restricted or sanctioned business. Are we using realistic “effective fleet” numbers that strip out older and grey tonnage when we decide how much VLCC exposure to add?
⚓ Capesize and dry bulk Around 10 percent of fleet for bulk overall, single digit to low teens for Capesize. One of the most disciplined orderbooks in deep sea shipping. Fleet growth is modest and a sizeable block of older ships faces pressure from carbon rules and low speeds, so effective capacity can stay tight if tonne mile demand holds up. Do our bulk exposure and renewal plans assume today’s discipline continues, or do they still work if contracting picks up and fleet growth accelerates?
📦 Container ships Roughly 30 percent of fleet, about ten million TEU on order. Record orderbook after an earnings boom, heavily skewed to large, efficient and often alternative fuel capable newbuilds. Even with slow steaming and scrapping, most base cases show supply running ahead of demand deep into the decade. Are we treating new boxship orders as genuine upgrades, or just adding capacity into a sector that already has a long supply overhang?

The pattern is clear: VLCCs are in a late starting but manageable renewal phase, dry bulk still looks disciplined, and containers carry the biggest risk of long lasting oversupply. Capital allocation should reflect those three very different supply curves, not a single generic “shipping” view.


Segment deep dive

🛢️ VLCCs – under ordered or catching up?

After years of very low fleet growth, VLCCs are moving into a renewal cycle that looks moderate on paper but tighter in practice because so much capacity sits in an older, restricted sub-fleet.

Headline supply picture
Recent broker data puts the VLCC orderbook a little above the mid-teens as a share of the fleet, with a delivery bulge in 2026–2027 after almost no growth in 2024–2025.
A large slice of older tonnage trades under sanctions or tighter restrictions, so the usable fleet is smaller than the headline count.
Age profile
Market reviews show a heavy tail of VLCCs above 15 and 20 years, many of which face tighter vetting and employment limits, especially on sensitive routes.

1️⃣ Where VLCCs sit in the 2025 orderbook league table

Orderbook as a share of the existing fleet is a simple way to see who is really under ordered. Today, VLCCs sit in the middle: ahead of dry bulk but far below containers, which carry the clear overinvestment risk into the late 2020s.

Orderbook as % of fleet (recent estimates) Rounded from broker and trade press data
🛢️ VLCC crude tankers around 15%
⚓ Dry bulk (incl. Capesize) around 10–11%
📦 Container ships around 30–33%

Takeaway: VLCCs are no longer “forgotten” in the yard orderbook, but they are still a long way from the aggressive ordering seen in the container space.

2️⃣ Deliveries and retirements

  • Only a small number of VLCCs were delivered in 2024–2025, which kept fleet growth very low in the near term.
  • Deliveries rise sharply from 2026, with dozens of ships scheduled each year as owners finally renew older units.
  • A significant group of ships that reach 20 years plus through 2027 already face charter and insurance barriers.
  • This mix of low recent deliveries, a bulge of ageing ships and a rising orderbook keeps the real supply picture finely balanced.

3️⃣ Age, sanctions and effective fleet size

  • Analysts highlight an unusually high share of VLCCs above 15 and 20 years in the global fleet.
  • Many of the oldest units are concentrated in sanctioned or grey trades, where major oil companies and banks are absent.
  • For mainstream charterers, the usable VLCC pool is closer to the modern and mid-age fleet, not the total fleet on the register.
  • That gap between headline and effective supply is a big reason why rates can move even when the orderbook percentage looks moderate.

4️⃣ Owner playbook: what to watch into 2027

  • Track how much of the VLCC orderbook is dual fuel or clearly more efficient, not just the raw number of ships.
  • Compare the delivery curve with the schedule of ships crossing 15 and 20 years to see when high-grade supply actually tightens.
  • Follow sanctions and compliance rules that may lock more older tonnage into restricted trades or, in some scenarios, force early recycling.
  • Check yard slot availability: ordering now often means a delivery date around 2028 or later, which matters for cycle timing.

5️⃣ Questions boards and lenders will ask

  • Is the VLCC exposure concentrated in ships that will still clear vetting after 2030, or in older units that may become hard to place?
  • How sensitive are forward earnings to a scenario where the VLCC orderbook grows further from the mid-teens into higher territory?
  • Do planning decks use effective fleet estimates that strip out grey tonnage, or just headline fleet statistics?
  • Where does VLCC renewal sit versus other capital needs such as scrubbers, future fuel readiness and digital upgrades?
Segment deep dive

⚓ Capesize and dry bulk – still the disciplined corner?

Dry bulk carries one of the lowest orderbook to fleet ratios in deep sea shipping, and within that picture Capesize sits in a narrow band of replacement tonnage rather than a growth spree. Net fleet growth is slow and many ships are older, which keeps the supply story quite different from containers.

Dry bulk orderbook in context
Recent market reviews put the overall dry bulk orderbook near ten to eleven percent of the active fleet, which is low by historic standards and far below container levels.
Fleet growth is positive but modest, with deliveries only slightly ahead of removals and scrapping.
Capesize specific picture
Analysts describe a comparatively small Capesize orderbook, with some data series showing ratios in single digits and others around the low teens as sentiment has improved. Net fleet growth is expected to stay very low through the mid 2020s.

1️⃣ Orderbook and fleet growth through 2027

For dry bulk as a whole, an orderbook in the region of ten percent would normally be supportive. The risk now is less about a sudden wave of new ships and more about how much tonne mile demand actually grows. Within that, Capesize tonnage remains constrained compared with the last supercycle.

Dry bulk and Capesize supply snapshot Rounded from recent market commentary
Metric Recent view What it implies
Dry bulk orderbook to fleet ratio Around 10–11 percent Low to moderate supply growth if trade stays steady.
Capesize orderbook to fleet Single digit to low teens More of a renewal cycle than a volume expansion.
Expected net Capesize fleet growth mid 2020s Low single digits per year Effective supply can even fall once slow steaming and drydock time are included.

The main message is that bulkers in general, and Capes in particular, have not repeated the aggressive ordering seen on the container side.

2️⃣ Age profile and demolition pressure

  • Dry bulk fleets include a substantial block of older ships above 20 years, particularly in smaller sizes, while the Capesize and VLOC segment is younger but still carries a visible tail of older units.
  • Low scrapping in recent years means ageing ships remain on the water even where earnings are marginal.
  • Stricter emissions and efficiency rules are expected to push more older bulkers toward recycling through the late 2020s.
  • In Capesize, replacement orders are increasingly tied to fuel efficiency and regulatory compliance rather than pure volume bets.

3️⃣ Speed, downtime and effective capacity

  • New carbon rules and technical speed limits keep average Capesize speeds low, which reduces effective supply without scrapping a single ship.
  • Higher drydock time for retrofits and maintenance further trims the number of days available for earning cargo.
  • Owners with modern eco Capes can trade at competitive speeds while still clearing CII and fuel cost requirements.
  • For charterers, this splits the market between vessels that can take long term contracts comfortably and those that are increasingly confined to opportunistic spot work.

4️⃣ Owner playbook to 2027

  • Track how much of the dry bulk orderbook sits in Capesize versus smaller segments and how much is alternative fuel capable.
  • Map the age curve of your own Capes against expected regulatory tightening and likely demolition windows.
  • Stress test earnings with slightly lower effective supply, not just headline fleet numbers, to understand upside scenarios.
  • Watch iron ore and coal tonne mile demand into Asia as the key driver for whether a “disciplined” orderbook really turns into a sustained tight market.

5️⃣ Questions boards and lenders will ask

  • Are we treating Capesize as a structurally tight segment or as one that could swing quickly if contracting picks up again?
  • How much of our exposure depends on older bulkers that may struggle with future carbon and efficiency rules?
  • Do our investment cases use realistic assumptions on speed, off hire and drydock time, or just nameplate capacity?
  • How does Capesize capital compete with alternative uses of cash, including containers, tankers or returning money to shareholders?
Segment deep dive

📦 Container ships – record orderbook, long overhang

Boxships are the clear outlier in this cycle. The global container orderbook has climbed to record territory as a share of the fleet, much of it in large alternative fuel capable ships. Even if part of that replaces older tonnage, most analysts now expect supply to run ahead of demand well into the second half of the decade.

Record pipeline
Recent industry data puts the container orderbook around ten million TEU and roughly thirty to thirty three percent of the fleet in service. That is the highest ratio since the period that led into the last long oversupply phase.
Contracting since mid 2024 has remained heavy, even after a large wave of ships already delivered.
Age and replacement
The average container fleet age has risen into the low to mid teens, with around a fifth of capacity more than twenty years old. Analysts note that the current orderbook more than covers the pool of older tonnage that could realistically be recycled this decade.
Fuel transition
A large share of recent boxship orders are alternative fuel capable or designed around very low consumption, which intensifies competitive pressure on older, conventional ships once they deliver.

1️⃣ Orderbook and fleet growth into the late 2020s

Multiple data sets now point to a container orderbook above ten million TEU and an orderbook to fleet ratio around the low thirties. Forecasts from liner analysts and brokers generally show fleet growth outpacing demand for several years, even after allowing for slow steaming and some scrapping of older tonnage.

Container supply snapshot Rounded from recent market commentary
Metric Recent view What it implies
Orderbook to fleet ratio Around 30 to 33 percent Highest level since the last pre crisis boom. A long overhang is possible.
Orderbook size Roughly ten million TEU Capacity on order comparable to several large carriers entire existing fleets.
Fleet growth vs demand Fleet expected to grow faster than demand through most of the decade in many scenarios Risk of persistent pressure on freight rates without strong discipline on capacity management.

For owners, the key question is not whether the orderbook is large but how much of it is truly replacement versus net growth that competes directly with today’s fleet.

2️⃣ Age profile and replacement pressure

  • Average container fleet age has risen into the low to mid teen years, making it the oldest of the main deep sea sectors in many comparisons.
  • Roughly a fifth of capacity sits above twenty years of age, particularly in mid sized and smaller ships that are less efficient on fuel and emissions.
  • Analyst work comparing TEU on order with TEU older than twenty years suggests the current orderbook is more than sufficient to replace ageing tonnage.
  • The real unknown is how fast owners are willing or able to recycle older ships while freight markets remain volatile.

3️⃣ Alternative fuels and competitive gap

  • A high share of recent container orders are alternative fuel capable or built around very low consumption profiles.
  • Many large newbuilds sit in the 8 000 TEU and above brackets, concentrated in neo panamax and larger classes that dominate mainline trades.
  • Older conventional ships can compete on capital cost but face higher operating expenses and more pressure from emissions rules and customer expectations.
  • Once the new cohort delivers in full, charterers will have far more choice of efficient, low emission ships at each size band.

4️⃣ Owner playbook to 2027 and beyond

  • Segment your fleet by size, age and fuel capability, then map that against the delivery schedule in each trade lane you serve.
  • Stress test earnings with realistic assumptions on new tonnage arrival, slow steaming and possible demand shocks, not just base case growth curves.
  • Consider whether new orders genuinely upgrade your position or simply add capacity into an already heavy pipeline.
  • Keep close track of alliance capacity management and blank sailing patterns, since these will be the main tools used to absorb surplus ships.

5️⃣ Questions boards and lenders will ask

  • How exposed are we to a long period of softer freight rates if fleet growth stays ahead of demand to the end of the decade.
  • Does our fleet plan treat alternative fuel capable ships as a must have standard, or as a niche add on.
  • Are we relying on slow steaming alone to absorb capacity, and if so how does that affect service quality and contract commitments.
  • Where does new container tonnage sit in the queue against other capital needs like tanker or bulk exposure, logistics investments or debt reduction.

Taken together, the VLCC, Capesize and container orderbooks show three very different cycles: crude tankers are finally renewing after years of under investment, dry bulk looks relatively disciplined with a small orderbook against an ageing fleet, and containers are sitting on a record pipeline that will hang over rates unless capacity is tightly managed. For boards and lenders the real task is to stop asking whether “shipping” is under ordered and instead decide, segment by segment, where fresh capital actually improves the fleet’s position and where it simply adds one more ship to an already crowded delivery queue.

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.
By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact