UK locks in 78% North Sea tax as Industry Warns of 66 Billion Dollar Investment Hole

November 28, 2025

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter

The UK government has confirmed that the Energy Profits Levy will stay in place until March 2030, keeping the headline tax rate on North Sea oil and gas profits at around 78 percent. Industry body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) says the decision will deter about 50 billion pounds, roughly 66 billion dollars, of upstream investment, speeding up production decline and pushing projects, jobs and supply chain work out of the UK continental shelf.

Click here for 30 second summary

North Sea tax in 30 seconds

The UK is keeping its Energy Profits Levy on North Sea oil and gas in place to 2030, holding the effective tax rate on profits around 78%. Industry group forecasts suggest this could deter about 50 billion pounds of upstream investment, close to 66 billion dollars, as companies redirect capital to lower tax basins. Less capex over time means fewer new projects and a faster production decline, with more of UK demand met by imported crude, products and LNG instead of domestic barrels.

🧭 Basin signal

The North Sea shifts further toward a mature, high tax basin. Operators lean on short tie backs, integrity work and life extension, while large standalone developments become harder to justify. Extra days at anchor raise costs for owner and charterer when projects are delayed or cancelled, and the region competes less effectively for global upstream budgets.

⚓ Fleet and project pipeline

Offshore support vessels, subsea contractors, heavy lift ships and fabrication yards face a thinner pipeline of multi year field developments. Some of that work is replaced by decommissioning and removal campaigns, but these come in uneven waves. Local ports and coastal economies tied to oil and gas see fewer large construction peaks and more dependence on shorter, campaign based scopes.

💸 Energy flows and tonne miles

As UK output falls faster than demand, more energy arrives by sea from other regions. That can support tonne mile demand for tankers and LNG carriers, but it shifts value and control away from UK controlled offshore assets. For owners and charterers, the levy turns fiscal risk in the North Sea into a recurring cost factor that has to be weighed against opportunities in other basins.

Bottom line: a locked in 78% tax rate and an estimated 66 billion dollar investment hole point to a North Sea that does more tie backs, integrity work and decommissioning and fewer big new projects, while the UK leans more on imported energy and local offshore fleets work harder to keep utilisation and rates steady.

Item	Summary	Business Mechanics	Bottom-Line Effect
UK Energy Profits Levy to 2030: Industry Impact
Decision and headline rate	Budget confirms the Energy Profits Levy stays in place until March 2030, keeping the combined upstream tax rate near 78 percent when the levy applies.	The levy sits on top of existing ring fence corporation tax and supplementary charge, with a higher rate and weaker allowances than when first introduced in 2022.	📈 Fiscal clarity gives well capitalised operators a stable tax base to model around, 📉 but the high headline rate makes marginal North Sea projects harder to justify against global portfolios.
Investment drag	Industry groups warn that retaining the levy to 2030 could prevent tens of billions of pounds in UK upstream investment and accelerate decline in mature fields.	Cash flows are clipped in the near term and investment allowances have been scaled back, so fewer appraisals and greenfield projects reach final investment decision.	📈 Incumbents with low lifting costs can still sweat existing assets, 📉 but new drilling, tie backs and life extension work risk being deferred, shrinking the future project pipeline for ships and yards.
Production and reserves	Forecasts point to a steeper fall in UK oil and gas output toward 2030 as fewer developments move ahead under the current tax load.	Lower reinvestment in new wells and enhanced recovery hits reserves replacement, shortening field lives and bringing forward natural decline.	📈 Existing producing hubs remain busy in the short term as operators harvest remaining barrels, 📉 but reduced reserves lengthen the odds on long term rig, PSV and subsea demand in the basin.
M and A and portfolio moves	Some majors have already trimmed UK exposure and independents are re running economics under the higher, longer levy horizon.	Assets may change hands to owners with lower cost of capital or different risk appetite, while others are run for cash and then decommissioned.	📈 Fleet operators with strong relationships to remaining core players can stay embedded in work scopes, 📉 but shrinking portfolios and exits cut the number of customers and projects to chase.
Offshore vessels and subsea	Fewer sanctions for new wells, tie backs and brownfield upgrades translate into a thinner backlog for PSVs, AHTS, construction and subsea tonnage.	Day rates and utilisation hold up on already awarded work, but visibility beyond current campaigns depends on whether operators commit to new drilling and intervention plans.	📈 Older ships keep earning in the short term on maintenance and safety critical work, 📉 but the slower project slate caps upside on renewal, pricing power and long term charter cover in the UK sector.
Fabrication, yards and services	Engineering houses, yards and equipment suppliers face a more volatile order book as operators trim discretionary capex under the extended levy.	Frameworks on integrity and regulatory work continue, but larger packages for new topsides, subsea kits and platform upgrades are harder to secure.	📈 Core safety, inspection and regulatory scopes stay resilient for service firms, 📉 while higher value growth projects risk being re routed to jurisdictions with lighter fiscal terms.
Jobs and supply chain resilience	Trade bodies flag thousands of potential job losses through the decade if investment does not recover, with knock on effects across coastal communities.	Contractors carry more utilisation risk and may shrink headcount, while skilled workers drift to overseas markets or adjacent sectors such as offshore wind.	📈 Firms that pivot into decommissioning and renewables can retain teams and vessel capacity, 📉 but prolonged under investment erodes the North Sea skills base that oil, gas and low carbon projects all depend on.
Energy security and imports	Steeper domestic decline means a higher share of UK demand is met by imported hydrocarbons unless demand falls faster than supply.	Reduced local output shifts trade flows toward LNG and seaborne crude and products, with higher exposure to external shocks and freight markets.	📈 More import activity can create tanker and LNG shipping opportunity into UK ports, 📉 but a weaker upstream base cuts local content, tax receipts and long term justification for some offshore support tonnage.
Policy risk and future reforms	The levy has an end date, but also an escape clause if prices drop to predefined levels, leaving a live policy debate through the decade.	Industry will keep lobbying for earlier reform or a smoother replacement mechanism; investors price in the chance of further tax changes either way.	📈 Any credible roadmap to a lower, more predictable regime could unlock delayed North Sea projects, 📉 while extended uncertainty risks pushing capital and fleets permanently toward other basins.
Notes: Snapshot of the UK Energy Profits Levy and its extension to 2030, and industry assessments of investment, production and employment impacts, based on late 2025 public reporting. Effects will vary by operator, asset quality and exposure to UK versus global portfolios.

Headline tax load

78% marginal rate

Combined ring fence and levy rate on North Sea profits when prices are above the trigger level.

Upstream investment at risk

~ £50 billion

Trade body estimate of capital that may not be secured if the levy runs to 2030 with no reform.

Jobs and production signal

1,000 jobs / month

Industry modelling flags potential loss of roughly one thousand jobs each month and a drop of about 40% in output by 2030 without earlier change.

How the work pipeline shifts for North Sea shipping and services

2025 to 2028 – cash and quick tie backs

Operators favour low capex tie backs into existing hubs over new standalone fields.
Drilling and construction campaigns tilt toward short subsea scopes and targeted well work.
OSVs, subsea vessels and heavy lift units see more stop start utilisation and shorter contracts.

2029 to 2030 – fewer new barrels, more removals

Pipeline of new North Sea projects thins as investment is redirected to lower tax basins.
Decommissioning, removal and life extension work gradually take a larger share of offshore spend.
Specialised heavy lift and subsea contractors gain selective upside, while generalist tonnage sees less predictable demand.

Stakeholder lens: quick scan for shipping and offshore

Stakeholder	Directional positives	Directional pressures
Offshore support vessel owners	• Tie back campaigns and integrity work still require PSVs, AHTS and walk-to-work tonnage. • Decommissioning and removal scopes can support demand for anchor handlers and construction support.	• A thinner project slate reduces multi-year charter cover from North Sea operators. • Regional owners that cannot reposition vessels may face lower utilisation and softer day rates.
Subsea, engineering and heavy lift	• Decommissioning pipelines create recurring lifts and subsea scopes on aging platforms and pipelines. • Infill and low-risk brownfield projects can still produce useful engineering and installation packages.	• Loss of large greenfield projects removes some of the biggest single contracts from the region. • Fabrication yards and heavy lift fleets see more cyclical, campaign-based work instead of continuous build programs.
Ports, yards and coastal economies	• Decommissioning, repairs and life-extension work keep some fabrication, laydown and storage areas active. • There is scope to pivot toward offshore wind assembly and maintenance where skills and assets overlap.	• Fewer large projects reduce hotel nights, local spending and cargo throughputs in traditional oil hubs. • Supply chains tied tightly to oil and gas risk under-use without timely replacement work from new sectors.
Deepsea tanker and LNG trades	• Declining UK North Sea output can lift long-haul import demand for crude, products and LNG. • More import barrels and molecules into the UK and Europe can support tonne-mile demand on selected routes.	• The shift from domestic production to imports weakens the strategic position of UK-based offshore fleets. • Policy and fiscal volatility can influence where long-term supply contracts are signed and financed.

Where proactive owners can still win

Use mixed oil, gas and decommissioning portfolios to smooth out the weaker North Sea development pipeline.
Position tonnage and teams for tie back, integrity and removal work rather than only large greenfield projects.
Leverage North Sea credentials in other mature basins that value experience in high tax and high regulation environments.

Key watchpoints for the decade

Whether the government brings forward any reform before 2030 that improves visibility for long life projects.
How fast North Sea focused fleets can diversify into offshore wind, interconnector work or other regions.
How quickly rising import dependence reshapes trade flows into the UK and the role of UK ports in those chains.

Keeping the UK Energy Profits Levy through 2030 effectively locks in a high marginal tax rate at a time when North Sea fields are already in decline. Industry modelling now frames the cost not only in terms of operator profits but also as roughly fifty billion pounds of upstream investment that may not land in the basin, along with a projected forty percent drop in output by 2030 and the loss of around a thousand jobs each month if there is no earlier reform.

We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.

By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact