9 Cyber Threats Keeping Shipowners Awake at Night

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter
In today’s hyperconnected maritime world, your vessel isn’t just vulnerable to storms or engine failure, it’s now in the crosshairs of invisible adversaries thousands of miles away. From hostile nation-states to ransomware gangs, attackers are targeting your bridge systems, ECDIS charts, VSAT links, and even your bunker flow meters. This list covers the most pressing digital threats disrupting commercial shipping in 2025 and as we move into 2026 real, documented, and rising fast.

- Several major shipping companies have publicly confirmed ransomware-related disruptions since 2020.
- In 2024–2025, attackers have shifted focus toward mid-size operators and regional ports with weaker defenses.
- Average ransom demands in maritime cases now exceed $4 million, according to industry threat reports.
- Crew email servers and voyage planning systems on vessels.
- Digital booking platforms, container handling software, and terminal scheduling tools ashore.
- Engine-monitoring systems and bridge automation tools accessed via remote connections or USB devices.
- One of the world’s largest carriers reported nearly $300 million in damages after a ransomware attack disrupted global operations.
- Another major operator experienced a multi-day system outage affecting cargo tracking and documentation.
- Regional ports in Asia and Europe have reported ransomware-related automation shutdowns lasting 24–72 hours.
- Separate onboard and shore-side systems with unique credentials and multi-factor authentication.
- Perform regular, offline backups of navigation data, engine configurations, and communication logs.
- Deploy endpoint detection & response (EDR) solutions across both vessel and office environments.
- Ransomware is a direct threat to maritime continuity. Prevention and rehearsed recovery plans are critical, especially for fleet operators reliant on digital systems from ship to shore.
- Researchers have documented AIS spoofing incidents showing “ghost ships” appearing in the English Channel, Mediterranean, and Black Sea.
- GPS spoofing has occurred near Shanghai, the Persian Gulf, and Arctic waters, affecting both commercial vessels and research ships.
- Military and security analysts warn that spoofing is no longer rare and may be used to mask sanctions violations or disorient shipping traffic.
- A vessel's real location is overwritten with a fake one by broadcasting false coordinates.
- Spoofed AIS signals can clone or fabricate ships, disrupting maritime situational awareness.
- GPS spoofing can steer vessels slightly off-course without immediate crew detection.
- In 2023, GPS interference affected hundreds of commercial ships transiting the Suez Canal and the Eastern Mediterranean, according to reports by C4ADS and commercial tracking platforms like Pole Star and Windward.
- A NATO maritime security bulletin in 2024 warned of coordinated spoofing near Kaliningrad and the Black Sea.
- In the Arctic, spoofed positions have been used to obscure the routes of ice-class vessels conducting research or logistics operations.
- Cross-check GPS data with radar and visual bearings, especially in regions with spoofing history.
- Monitor AIS anomalies using reliable satellite-tracking overlays and alerts.
- Train bridge officers to recognize spoofing indicators, such as inconsistent speed or erratic heading shifts.
- Signal spoofing is no longer hypothetical. It can undermine navigational safety, cause detours, and hide high-risk behaviors. Vigilant detection protocols are essential in contested waters and near major chokepoints.
- Propulsion and ballast control systems aboard tankers and cargo ships.
- Dockside crane systems and port community platforms that schedule vessel traffic and loading operations.
- Classification society portals and ship registries, which store sensitive vessel and ownership data.
- The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) and NATO have flagged port infrastructure and ship control networks as strategic targets in recent threat assessments.
- Security firm Dragos reported in 2024 that OT-specific malware variants were observed in sectors linked to shipping and offshore energy logistics.
- Shipbuilding firms and satellite communication vendors have also been probed by actors with suspected ties to state intelligence services.
- In 2023, a logistics firm with maritime OT exposure experienced system downtime traced back to malware designed to remain dormant for months before activation.
- Some port operators have responded by segmenting OT and IT networks, following advisories from the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
- Analysts warn that compromised OT systems could be triggered in future geopolitical flashpoints to disrupt trade or maritime chokepoints.
- Audit all OT systems to ensure proper segmentation from internet-connected business networks.
- Limit remote access to OT systems and monitor all vendor activity, especially during maintenance windows.
- Deploy intrusion detection tools designed specifically for industrial protocols used in maritime systems.
- State-linked cyber actors see maritime OT as a high-value strategic target. Protecting ship and port control systems must be part of every fleet’s national security posture.
- VSAT and L-band satellite links providing broadband connectivity and backup communication channels.
- Chart updates delivered over IP-based maritime platforms, such as ECDIS data via satellite.
- Engine telemetry and remote diagnostics tools used by shore-based technical teams.
- In early 2022, the Viasat KA-SAT network was disrupted by a cyberattack that cut connectivity to thousands of terminals across Europe, including maritime users.
- Maritime vessels in the Eastern Mediterranean and Black Sea have reported satellite interference, likely linked to military jamming or cyber operations.
- Several maritime operators have confirmed experiencing service degradation in 2024 due to targeted signal interference near conflict zones.
- One research vessel operating in the Arctic in late 2024 reported complete loss of remote weather and system telemetry for over 36 hours.
- Merchant ships in contested regions like the Red Sea and Baltic have encountered temporary loss of access to voyage plan updates and weather overlays.
- Fleet IT managers are increasingly being asked to pre-load charts and comms data before sailing into known interference zones.
- Ensure ECDIS, weather, and engine data can operate with preloaded offline backups if connectivity is lost.
- Use dual-channel systems (e.g. VSAT + Iridium or L-band) for redundancy where possible.
- Train bridge and engineering crews to operate with minimal shore-side input for critical systems.
- Satellite outages aren't theoretical—they can cut ships off from navigational and engineering data mid-voyage. Redundant systems and offline readiness are now essential in high-risk waters.
- Hacktivists scrape AIS data to find vessels flying certain national flags or operated by politically affiliated entities.
- Once targets are identified, attackers trace domain records and employee info to reach the company’s digital infrastructure.
- Targets may then be hit with DDoS attacks, defacement, or ransomware-style data destruction, even without a ransom demand.
- Pro-Palestinian and pro-Russian hacktivist groups have claimed responsibility for cyber disruptions aimed at Western-aligned shipping and logistics firms in 2023–2025.
- Maritime cybersecurity analysts tracked AIS scraping activity originating from known hacktivist Telegram channels and dark web forums.
- Some campaigns have published partial crew manifests or targeted port partners of flagged vessels to disrupt business operations indirectly.
- In early 2024, a European freight forwarder experienced a DDoS attack that lasted 3 days after one of its vessels was listed in a hacktivist “watchlist” for transiting the Red Sea.
- Shipping operators have reported phishing attempts against crew and operations teams shortly after their AIS-linked company domains were circulated in chat groups.
- Several logistics firms were temporarily removed from cloud-based manifest systems after coordinated traffic floods overwhelmed their login portals.
- Review what company and vessel metadata is publicly exposed across AIS tracking platforms and third-party aggregators.
- Monitor dark web and hacktivist channels through a threat intelligence provider or MSSP.
- Implement rate limiting and DDoS mitigation tools on all public-facing portals and customer platforms.
- Public AIS data can be weaponized by non-state actors seeking to damage reputations or disrupt operations. Awareness, obfuscation where legal, and strong perimeter defenses are critical in today’s environment.
- Maritime companies often have globally dispersed teams with varying IT security training.
- Many shore-side systems still rely on legacy authentication without multifactor protection.
- Credential reuse across internal tools, cloud services, and vessel platforms is common—and dangerous.
- In 2024, a European logistics firm linked to port operations suffered a ransomware breach that began with a compromised Microsoft 365 login reused across multiple systems.
- Phishing emails impersonating port authorities or customs offices have successfully tricked operators into handing over login credentials to booking and manifest tools.
- Cybersecurity analysts warn that smaller shipping agents and freight forwarders are increasingly being used as initial attack vectors into larger carrier ecosystems.
- Credential stuffing attacks led to unauthorized access to shipping schedules, billing records, and crew rosters at multiple regional firms in 2023–2025.
- One ransomware campaign used stolen credentials to remotely lock shore-side shipping desks and disrupt documentation for more than 50 vessels.
- Insurance premiums for maritime cyber coverage are rising partly due to the frequency of credential-based incidents.
- Require multifactor authentication (MFA) across all critical systems, both onshore and offshore.
- Use password managers and ensure unique, strong credentials for every user account.
- Conduct phishing simulations and incident response drills with office staff quarterly.
- Your vessel's security is only as strong as your weakest shore-side password. Treat land-based user accounts as frontline access points and harden them accordingly.
- Bridge systems like ECDIS are often air-gapped but still updated manually through USB drives or laptops.
- Some update processes rely on external vendors or third-party technicians, increasing the risk of compromised media.
- Malware can remain dormant until triggered by specific conditions, such as sailing into a defined geographic area.
- In 2023 and 2024, maritime-focused security firms reported malware strains discovered on bridge laptops used for navigation updates and system diagnostics.
- Some vessels received malicious software bundled with unofficial chart updates or configuration files obtained from unverified sources.
- Several ship operators now report policies against using portable media onboard unless scanned and logged by cybersecurity personnel.
- One cargo vessel in the Indian Ocean experienced an unexpected reboot of its navigation suite during transit, later traced to corrupted ECDIS files.
- Malware-injected bridge gear has been linked to position spoofing, loss of voyage plans, and temporary loss of radar integration in isolated cases.
- Vessels operating in high-risk geopolitical zones are increasingly advised to preload updates prior to departure and validate them using secure hashes.
- Use only official, verified sources for navigation and firmware updates. Avoid third-party links or manual downloads from unknown providers.
- Scan all USB devices with approved antivirus tools before plugging into any shipboard systems.
- Develop and enforce a digital update policy for ECDIS, radar, and bridge control systems, with traceability for all installed files.
- Even one tainted update can undermine navigation safety. Standardize secure update procedures, control portable media use, and treat every chart update like a cybersecurity event.
- Integrated PCS used to coordinate terminal, customs, tug, pilot, and ship agent operations.
- Cloud-based tools used for electronic bills of lading (eBL), slot booking, and freight tracking.
- Port logistics platforms with third-party API access to trucking, rail, and warehouse partners.
- In 2023, a vulnerability in a Southeast Asian PCS API exposed cargo manifest data and vessel schedules to unauthorized users.
- Several ransomware groups have shifted to attacking cloud-based maritime ERP and documentation platforms, exploiting weak admin credentials and unsecured backups.
- Insurers and regional cybersecurity agencies have warned that many ports still lack segmentation between their business networks and operational systems.
- A container terminal in the Middle East experienced delays of over 48 hours after its booking platform was disabled by a DDoS attack in late 2024.
- Unauthorized access to customs clearance records disrupted cargo releases at a European port in Q1 2025, confirmed by port authority statements.
- Supply chain data leaks have been traced to exploited cloud storage misconfigurations used by shipping agents and freight forwarders.
- Ensure role-based access control (RBAC) is enforced across all connected cloud services and PCS tools.
- Audit API endpoints and restrict partner access to only essential data or functions.
- Confirm cyber readiness with every port call, especially when relying on third-party digital coordination tools.
- Ports and platforms are now digital supply chain hubs. A weak PCS or cloud setup can delay vessels, compromise cargo data, or trigger cascading trade disruptions. Security must be baked into every integration.
- Smart container temperature, humidity, and shock sensors.
- Bunker flow meters and engine-room vibration sensors tied to maintenance alerts.
- Bridge and machinery space IoT monitoring systems with remote reporting capability.
- In 2023 and 2024, security researchers demonstrated how unencrypted telemetry from smart containers could be intercepted or spoofed by nearby attackers.
- Several maritime cybersecurity firms reported successful red team simulations in which IoT sensors were used to pivot into OT and bridge systems via unsecured shipboard routers.
- Public ports and maritime operators in North America and Europe have issued internal advisories limiting third-party IoT integrations unless security-tested.
- One reefer container operator discovered tampered temperature logs during a food shipment audit, later traced to a compromised sensor with default credentials.
- Shipboard engineers on multiple vessels in 2024 reported false-positive fuel alerts due to manipulated flow sensor readings introduced via onboard network weaknesses.
- Unauthorized access to IoT bridge components caused intermittent sensor data loss on two vessels operating in high-traffic coastal waters, confirmed by security firms under NDA.
- Change all default passwords on IoT sensors and gateways and disable unused ports.
- Segment IoT traffic from navigation and engine control networks using VLANs or firewalls.
- Vet all IoT suppliers for compliance with maritime cybersecurity standards such as IEC 62443 or BIMCO guidelines.
- Every IoT sensor is a potential weak link in your cyber defense chain. Without proper controls, a simple temperature monitor could open the door to deeper intrusion. Secure the edge to protect the core.
The digital transformation of the maritime industry has delivered speed, visibility, and smarter operations. But it’s also brought with it an expanded attack surface, one that threat actors are actively exploiting.
Whether it's ransomware holding systems hostage, spoofed AIS data steering ships into confusion, or malicious code embedded in a USB update, modern cyber threats don’t just affect office IT, they impact ships at sea, ports on the move, and cargo in real time.
As attacks grow more targeted, automated, and politically motivated, passive defense is no longer enough. Shipowners, operators, and maritime IT leaders must take proactive steps to secure every layer of their infrastructure, from bridge to cloud.
Important Points:
- Cyberattacks are no longer rare events—they are recurring and increasingly sophisticated.
- Operational Technology (OT) is a primary target, especially in geopolitically sensitive zones.
- Open data sources like AIS and weak IoT devices are being actively exploited.
- Basic defenses are not enough—passwords alone won’t stop modern threats.
- Shipboard teams and shore offices must both be hardened, with rehearsed response plans and segmented systems.
- Threats don’t just cause data loss—they delay voyages, spike insurance premiums, and risk safety at sea.
✅ Next Steps to Strengthen Your Cyber Posture
- Conduct a full vessel and office cyber audit, including OT, IoT, and crew access.
- Mandate multifactor authentication and change all default passwords.
- Review and secure all USB-driven update procedures.
- Work with a maritime-specific cybersecurity partner, not just a general IT provider.
- Monitor dark web and AIS scraping activity through a threat intelligence service.
- Create a response playbook for ransomware, spoofing, and connectivity loss scenarios.
Maritime cybersecurity is no longer just an IT issue. It is a mission-critical requirement for keeping vessels safe, cargo moving, and operations profitable in a hostile digital environment. If you don’t prepare now, the cost of reacting later could be catastrophic.
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.