Ship Universe is designed for maritime stakeholders: lower costs with data-backed decisions. Mobile-friendly but designed for desktop research. Data is fluid, verify critical details before acting.
The decision to dismantle a ship used to be simple. Once operational costs outpaced earnings, a sale to the scrapyard offered a clean financial exit. But in today’s market, scrapping involves far more than a one-time payout. Costs vary significantly by region, vessel type, and compliance level, with green recycling premiums, crew logistics, towage fees, and pre-demolition preparation all eating into final margins.
This report breaks down the full economic picture of shipbreaking in 2025. From updated per-ton pricing across major scrapping regions to the hidden operational costs and regulatory pressures influencing owner decisions, we’ll explore where the real value lies and how it’s changing.
📈 Average Scrap Prices by Region (2025 YTD)
Shipbreaking prices in 2025 vary widely depending on regional demand, yard compliance, and global steel trends. In South Asia, particularly in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan, prices remain robust despite seasonal slowdowns. Turkey’s market is softer, mirroring European scrap price trends. This table presents a snapshot of average scrap steel prices per light displacement ton in major recycling hubs, a key reference when evaluating scrapping economics. To calculate shipbreaking ROI try out our new Shipbreaking ROI Calculator.
Average Scrap Steel Prices by Region (USD per LDT, 2025 YTD)
Region
Price Range
Notes
India (Alang)
435 – 460
Stable; steel market recovery driving demand
Bangladesh (Chittagong)
460 – 490
Strong buying interest despite monsoon slowdown
Pakistan (Gadani)
440 – 470
Cautious market; currency and LC issues remain
Turkey (Aliaga)
280 – 300
EU-compliant yards; softer demand and steel prices
China (Restricted)
Not Active
Domestic dismantling limited to Chinese-flagged ships
Notes: Prices are indicative and vary by vessel type, condition, and fuel residues. Based on data from industry sources and press releases as of Q2 2025.
🧾 Cost Breakdown for Shipowners
Owners must navigate a labyrinth of expenses ranging from logistical arrangements to regulatory compliance. The costs begin with moving the ship to the designated scrapyard and extend through pre-demolition preparations, hazardous materials removal, crew repatriation, and the administrative overhead of managing certifications and inspections. Each factor plays a critical role in determining the final net proceeds from a scrapping contract. The table below provides a detailed breakdown of the typical cost items, reflecting data and trends validated by industry sources and market reports for 2025.
Cost Breakdown for Shipowners
Cost Category
Estimated Cost Range (USD)
Description & Notes
Towing and Transit
50,000 – 120,000
Costs vary with vessel size and distance from operating location to the scrapyard. Larger container vessels or tankers may incur higher fees.
Pre-Demolition Preparation
30,000 – 70,000
Includes decontamination, removal of oil residues, and other hazardous materials to meet environmental standards.
Crew Repatriation
15,000 – 35,000
Expenses for repatriating crew members, which vary depending on crew size and locations involved.
Certification, Inspections, and Surveys
10,000 – 30,000
Covers all mandatory surveys, class inspections, and certification documents required by regulatory authorities and scrapyards.
Administrative & Documentation Fees
5,000 – 20,000
Costs for legal and administrative processes including flag de-registration and transfer documentation.
Environmental Compliance Fees
20,000 – 50,000
Fees imposed by regulatory bodies for compliance with environmental standards or for green recycling certifications.
Scrapyard Overheads/Commission
25,000 – 60,000
The margin captured by scrapyards for handling the demolition, logistics, and recycling processes. Can also include incentive adjustments for high-volume yards.
Notes: The estimated cost ranges are based on aggregated data from industry reports, and reflect market conditions as of 2025. Actual costs may vary by vessel type, location, and current regulatory pressures.
🔩 Steel Market Influence
Global excess capacity, tariff fluctuations, and raw material trends create a ripple effect: when demand for steel is strong, scrap prices surge, elevating scrapyard offers and improving owner returns. Conversely, softening steel markets or trade disruptions erode scrap rates, diminishing incentives to scrap older vessels. This section examines how inflationary pressures, supply side shifts, and geopolitical factors shape the decision-making process for decommissioning ships.
Steel Market Influence on Ship Recycling Economics (2025)
Factor
Current Trend / Impact
Notes & Data
Global oversupply
Downward pressure on steel prices
Ongoing capacity build in China and India, leading to depressed prices and weaker scrap demand
Tariffs & trade policy
Volatile price swings
US steel tariffs in 2025 are dampening scrap demand and driving regional divergences
EAF / green steel adoption
Rising long-term scrap demand
Growth in electric-arc furnaces supports elevated scrap pricing outlook
Regional mill demand
Strong in ASEAN, weak in OECD
Demand strong in SEA/MENA, flat in OECD economies
Ferrous scrap inventories
Seasonal tightness raises prices
Three months of global scrap price gains as inventories tightened
Notes: Steel market drivers are based on industry reports, and GMS data. Impacts on ship recycling reflect how steel price movements influence port offers per LDT and owner scrap valuations.
🛳️ Ship Types and Scrap Timing
In 2025, despite strong freight markets, scrapping activity remains concentrated in mid-sized vessels that are less efficient and more exposed to regulatory costs. Larger classes like Capesize and VLCCs continue to be retained longer, thanks to their operational leverage and ongoing demand. However, as these ships age beyond 25–28 years, scrapping becomes increasingly likely, especially with looming IMO and EU compliance rules tightening the window for economic operation. Below is a detailed breakdown of scrapping activity and timing by ship type, based on the latest industry data.
Scrapping Breakdown by Ship Type (2025)
Ship Type
% of Scrap Volume YTD
Average Scrapping Age
Market Dynamics
Panamax Bulk Carriers
51 %
~28 years
Mid‑sized vessels hit by weaker freight rates; average fleet age rising to ~12.6 yrs, pushing older units toward scrap
Handysize Bulk Carriers
26 %
~31 years
Weak chartering market; smaller, older ships are being scrapped even as overall volume drops
Capesize Carriers
<10 %
>30 years
Very low scrapping rate; first Capesize scrapped in 2025 only recently
Tankers (Aframax/Suezmax)
Minimal
~16–19 years
Largely absorbed in shadow fleet; demolition rates remain near historic lows
Container / Feeder Ships
Emerging
25+ years
Older Panamax feeders being sold off for scrap as port infrastructure changes and canal dimensions evolve
Notes: Data from Industry reports for Q1/2 2025. Percentages refer to share of dry bulk scrapping volume.
♻️ Green vs Traditional Recycling
While green recycling yards meet stringent environmental and safety standards under frameworks like the Hong Kong Convention and EU regulations, they incur notably higher costs. Traditional beaching methods in South Asia, in contrast, offer higher scrap value but come with increased legal and reputational risks. What follows is an in-depth comparison of both approaches, using validated data from mid-2025 sources.
Green vs Traditional Ship Recycling: Cost & Process Comparison (2025)
Aspect
Green Recycling
Traditional Recycling
Implication
Scrap Value Paid
−30 to −50 USD/LDT compared to local benchmarks
Standard regional rates (~440–460 USD/LDT)
Green yards pay less due to higher operating costs.
Beaching methods with minimal infrastructure, manual labor
Green yards require significant capital investment.
Worker & Environmental Safety
High standards; PPE, training, regulated emissions
Low safety standards; documented pollution and hazards
Green methods reduce legal and reputational risk.
Certification Compliance
HKC, EU SRR compliant; regularly audited
No formal certification; often outside HKC
Green yields documented legality and access to regulated markets.
Reputation & Liability
Positive CSR; reduced environmental liability
Higher risk of spills, pollution fines, bad press
Green recycling safeguards brand integrity.
Notes: Green recycling yards comply with international standards but routinely pay 30–50 USD per LDT less in scrap value due to compliance costs. Traditional beaching remains the highest-value route but brings legal, environmental and reputational challenges.
🏛️ Regulatory Pressures Driving Scrapping
The introduction of stricter climate measures, hazardous material inventories, flagging complexities, and end-of-life standards has accelerated scrap decisions, especially for older, less efficient tonnage. In many cases, compliance costs or loss of trading eligibility push ships toward demolition sooner than planned. This section provides a detailed breakdown of the main regulatory pressures at play.
Key Regulatory Drivers of Scrapping in 2025
Regulation
Scope & Purpose
Scrapping Trigger
IMO EEXI / CII (2023–2026)
Energy efficiency ratings mandating engine power limits and CO₂ intensity thresholds
Ships rated D/E multiple years risk port delays or bans → scrapping attraktive over costly retrofits or slow steaming
Hong Kong Convention (June 2025 entry)
Global standard requiring Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM), ready-for-recycling certification, and compliant yards
Mandates IHM for EU-flagged/visiting ships and use of EU-approved facilities
Flagging-out or forced compliance; many owners scrap rather than re-flag or retrofit
Basel Convention & Waste Shipment Regulations
Globally restrict cross-border export of hazardous waste—including non-compliant ships
EU waste rules block beaching of EU-departed vessels in non-OECD yards → pushing green recycling or scrapping in compliant yards
Port‑State Control (Paris / Tokyo MoU)
Random inspections for EEXI, CII, IHM and cyber risk under Safety Management Systems
Failed inspections can delay ships weeks; owners scrap older ships to avoid detainment
Notes: All regulations are enforced or becoming enforceable in 2025. Compliance costs, lost trading revenue and inspection delays are common drivers leading to earlier-than-planned scrapping.
Forecast: What’s Next?
As 2025 progresses, the scrap ship market continues to be shaped by a complex interplay of regulatory, economic, and geopolitical forces. Owners, buyers, and analysts alike are asking: what comes next? Here's a detailed look at the emerging trends and likely shifts in the year ahead:
1️⃣ Steel Market Resilience Builder
Macro context: Though global steel production is ramping up—especially in China and India—growth in electric arc furnace (EAF)-based green steel is steadily boosting scrap demand. As green mill capacity scales, scrap rates may stabilize above 2024 lows.
Forecast: Expect scrap price support in the range of $430–470/LDT in South Asia, with Turkey and the EU fluctuating between $300–350/LDT depending on energy costs and mill needs.
2️⃣ Compliance Crunch Intensifies
Green standards rollout: The Hong Kong Convention, EU Ship Recycling Regulation, and global hazardous waste frameworks are now fully in force.
Implications: Non-compliant vessels face steep penalties, high inspection costs, or outright bans. As fleets age into areas needing IHM and EEXI upgrades, more shipowners may choose demolition over expensive retrofits or frustrated trade.
Forecast impact: Anticipate a 15–20% rise in demolitions for non-compliant tonnage by late 2025, especially mid- to small-sized bulkers and tankers.
3️⃣ Mid-Sized Dry Bulk Scrapping Continues
Market momentum: Panamax and Handysize carriers dominate scrap volumes (~70% cumulatively in 2025), driven by aging fleets and weakening freight markets.
Economic tipping point: With retrofit costs climbing and charter rates flat, older units will likely see scrapping activity continue aggressively into Q3 and Q4.
Expected scrapping volume: Up to 15% of the Panamax fleet could be scrapped by year-end, reshaping global age profiles.
4️⃣ Container Feeder & Liner Sector Cull
Infrastructure-driven removals: Canal expansions, port infrastructure for mega-ships, and green charter clauses are pushing older container and feeder ships out of circulation.
Timeline: Surge expected in late 2025–early 2026 as retrofit costs ignite or vessels fail to pass Pavement Performance or carbon compliance checks.
5️⃣ Geographic Shift Toward Compliance Yards
Yard dynamics: Green-certified facilities, especially in India (Alang, Gujarat), Turkey (Aliaga), and Europe, are absorbing more tonnage.
Capacity growth: Over the next two years, expect a 10–15% capacity increase in compliant yards, partly driven by EU funding for yard modernization.
Sustainable finance: Banks are increasingly issuing green loans tied to full-recycling documentation, while scrap buyers offer premium offers for certified demolition.
Risk management: Insurers impose higher premiums or even refuse to cover ships lacking IMO recycling certificates. This pressure could accelerate scrapping decisions, especially for older tonnage.
7️⃣ Aging Fleet Deceleration
Shadow fleet extension: For tankers and older bulker types, shipowners may extend use through underwater OTC trading, often in low-compliance regions, but face rising risk premiums and crew liabilities.
Beyond 2025: A slow tapering off is expected as retaliatory sanctions, insurance constraints, and regulatory pressure catch up with shadow fleet carriers.
Forecast Trends and Impacts (2025 and Beyond)
Trend
Forecast Period
Expected Impact
Scrap price stability
H2 2025
$430–470/LDT in South Asia; $300–350 in EU/Turkey
Compliance-driven scrapping surge
Mid–Late 2025
15–20% increase for aged mid-size vessels
Container feeder removals
Q4 2025 – 2026
Spike as retrofit costs, canal constraints shut out older vessels
Compliance yard capacity ramp-up
2025–2027
+10–15% capacity, strong attraction for certified demolition
Insurance/finance pressure
Ongoing
Green collateral benefits; non-certified vessels at financial disadvantage
Shadow fleet aging
Post-2025
Compliance gaps with insurance & sanctions make long-term viability suspect
Notes: Forecast reflects trends reported by industry sources. Market behavior may vary depending on fuel prices, retrofit costs, and regulatory enforcement strength.
✅ Actionable Insights for Stakeholders
Shipowners: Evaluate compliance retrofitting against demolition costs, especially for Panamax/Handysize vessels. Prioritize IHM certification to maintain demolition options.
Recyclers: This is the time to expand capacity in certified yards and market green demolition services proactively.
Financiers & Insurers: Use IHM and HKC documentation as risk filters. Develop green loan products or insurance incentives tied to compliant recycling.
Analysts & Markets: Expect volatility in global steel-linked assets; monitor shipping equity for sensitivity to mid-size bulker scrapping and retrofitting dynamics.
As the ship recycling landscape rapidly evolves, owners and operators are facing hard deadlines, rising compliance costs, and shifting economic incentives. Scrapping is no longer a last resort, it’s a strategic decision. Those who stay ahead of regulatory and market trends will be better positioned to preserve asset value, avoid penalties, and align with the future of sustainable shipping.
