Kansarmax vs Panamax – who wins in 2026?
📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter
The workhorses of mid-size dry bulk, Panamax and Kamsarmax, sit at the crossroads of grains, coal and bauxite. Specs look similar on paper, but tiny constraints (beam, draft, LOA) determine where they can load, how much they lift, and whether a voyage clears profit after canal, port and fuel realities. With 2026 shaping up as a heavy delivery year, owners and charterers need a lane-by-lane view rather than a single “winner.”
Panamax vs Kamsarmax — Fast Specs
Quick “can it fit?” guide before you model TCEs.
| Spec | Panamax Bulker | Kamsarmax Bulker |
|---|---|---|
| Typical DWT band | ~65,000–80,000 dwt | ~80,000–82,000 dwt (Panamax subset) |
| Max LOA used in practice | ≈ 294 m (original Panama locks) | ≈ 229 m (Port Kamsar LOA cap) |
| Max beam (legacy canal) | ≈ 32.31 m | ≈ 32.2–32.3 m |
| Max draft (TFW reference) | ≈ 12.04 m | Similar (design-series dependent) |
| Typical cargos | Grain, coal, iron ore, minor bulks | Grain, coal, bauxite (+ some hot coils) |
| Port/channel access highlight | Legacy Panama dimensions → routing options | Purpose-built for Kamsar stems in Guinea |
Demand Drivers to 2026 — What Moves Tonne-Miles
Grains, bauxite and coal signals framed for mid-size bulkers.
- South Atlantic crops (Brazil/Argentina) + Asia demand support long legs.
- Seasonality and congestion swing laycans; watch harvest windows.
- Guinea exports feed Chinese alumina/aluminum capacity.
- Berth/river windows + LOA compliance control liftings.
- Overall softer outlook; India/SEA pulls add regional support.
- AUS/ID → India/SEA and intra-Asia legs sustain mid-size activity.
Orderbook Pressure — Deliveries Landing by 2026
Shares are indicative by DWT; focus on what it means for mid-size earnings.
- Speed policy & weather routing settings (effective supply).
- Scrap prices & demolition appetite (removes older Panamaxes/Supras).
- Yard delivery slippage and retrofit yard congestion.
Panama Canal — Where We Are vs 2023–24
Quick operator snapshot: slots, draft, and fee tone.
Kamsarmax vs Panamax — Lane by Lane (2026)
Use this as a pre-fixture sense-check; confirm berth/draft locally.
Quick Picker — Panamax or Kamsarmax?
A lightweight sense-check. Adjust and see the lane-specific nudge.
Owner Playbook — 2026 Setup
Practical knobs to defend TCEs and compliance.
- Re-baseline CII with actual 2025 ops (speed, weather routing, waiting times).
- Confirm EEXI tech files and engine power limitation documentation are audit-ready.
- Plan margin for bad weather/queues to avoid CII letter grade slippage.
- Scrubber economics: only if your trade has persistent high HSFO–VLSFO spreads and port calls allow operations.
- Props/ducts/bulb tweaks: small capex but real fuel savings on steady lanes.
- ALT-fuel readiness: wiring/space for methanol or LNG-adjacent auxiliaries if yard slots align.
- Lean into Atlantic→Asia seasons (grains) and Guinea bauxite windows.
- Keep a backhaul map that toggles Canal on/off with conservative queue time bands.
- Watch Supras nibbling at smaller-port stems; defend parcel size where you can.
Bottom line: 2026 doesn’t crown a single champion so much as it rewards the ship that’s in the right lane at the right time. With grains and Guinea bauxite still pushing long-haul tonne-miles, Kamsarmax keeps a slight edge on the Atlantic→Asia runs, while a more normalized, but still variable, Panama Canal keeps Panamax relevant where routing optionality matters.
For owners and charterers, it is encouraged to keep a living routing model that toggles Canal on/off, protect parcel economics on grain/bauxite peaks, and defend your CII/EEXI margin with pragmatic speed and retrofit choices.
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.
