Offshore Wind Gathers Momentum with Global Projects and Policy Wins

📊 Subscribe to the Ship Universe Weekly Newsletter

Offshore energy is riding a new wave of development, investment, and policy support across the globe. From large-scale port upgrades in Northern Ireland to innovative data-integrated offshore wind leases in Texas, recent weeks have seen a strong surge of activity that signals continued growth for the sector. Despite some regional uncertainties, the momentum remains clearly in favor of expanding capacity, improving infrastructure, and strengthening the industry’s role in long-term energy transition strategies.

This overview highlights key developments across countries and markets, breaking down how various governments, ports, developers, and supporting industries are positioning offshore wind and ocean renewables for long-term impact.

Global Offshore Wind Expansion Snapshot
Region Estimated New Capacity Under Construction (GW) 2025 Highlight
Europe ~10–12 GW Major projects like Dogger Bank, Crown Estate investment pushes
Asia‑Pacific ~8‑9 GW Taiwan, Vietnam, Australia activity; floating pilots underway
North America ~5‑6 GW CVOW and Revolution Wind building; Empire Wind phase‑1 progressing
Emerging Markets & MENA ~2‑3 GW New leases in Canada; Red Sea Wind in Egypt; MENA growth accelerating
Estimates based on projects currently under construction or at advanced pre‑construction stage as of mid‑2025. Global new capacity expected to total ~19 GW by year‑end 2025.

Australia Sees Mixed Signals as Developer Rethinks Plans

One of the most talked-about updates involves the potential exit of a major wind developer from Australia. BlueFloat Energy, which had initially signaled strong interest in developing offshore wind projects off the coasts of Victoria and New South Wales, is now reassessing its commitment to the region.

Several factors are contributing to the review, including:

  • Delays in regulatory approvals and permitting timelines
  • Higher-than-anticipated costs of deployment
  • Grid infrastructure uncertainties

The broader concern isn’t the viability of offshore wind in Australia, but whether the current policies and local systems are aligned well enough to meet the country’s stated target of 9 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2040. For now, interest remains high from multiple players, but attention is shifting to how streamlined and scalable the regulatory process will become.

Offshore Wind Permitting Timelines by Country
Country Typical Total Timeline (Years) Key Delay Drivers Recent Changes or Goals
United States ~6–9 Federal NEPA/EIS reviews; state‑level grid & coastal permits BOEM aims to reduce COP review times; “Smart from the Start” areas streamline process
United Kingdom ~3–4 (harbour orders may add 3–4) Backlog at Marine Management Organisation for harbour infrastructure consents Industry calling for faster harbour order processing to meet net zero targets
Germany & Western Europe ~2–4 (environment/legal challenge risk may extend to 9) Environmental assessments; legal challenges under first‑come assessments EU renewables permitting reform aims to streamline timelines
Australia ~5–7 State‑federal coordination; grid/transmission licensing; community opposition New Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Act enables transmission licensing
Canada (Atlantic provinces) ~4–6 (nascent permitting regime) New federal-provincial frameworks; environmental baseline studies Bills C‑49/C‑90 establish permitting pathways and lease issuance
Timelines estimate from initial lease to approval / Record of Decision prior to construction. Legal and grid-review challenges can significantly extend these ranges.

Big Moves in Texas as Port Arthur Project Advances

In more encouraging news, Texas has approved a major lease agreement with Diligence Offshore Services for a new offshore wind development and utility-data center hybrid project near Port Arthur. This unique venture blends clean energy generation with digital infrastructure, offering a template for how offshore energy can be part of broader modernization efforts.

Key features of the Texas project include:

  • Utility-scale offshore wind farm design
  • Direct integration with a regional data processing center
  • Plans for a vertically integrated, locally based ownership structure

This marks the first such project led by a Black-owned utility in the United States, highlighting the role of diversity and community-focused planning in emerging energy markets.


Empire Wind 1 Continues Construction Amid Federal Leasing Pause

A federal pause on new offshore wind leases in the United States has raised questions about the pace of deployment, but not all projects are affected. Empire Wind 1, operated by Equinor, is moving ahead with construction because its lease and permits were secured prior to the federal action.

Located off the coast of New York, Empire Wind 1 is expected to generate enough power for half a million homes. Its second phase, Empire Wind 2, remains on hold while stakeholders review the implications of the current leasing restrictions.

Despite the pause, construction on several pre-approved sites continues. The delay in new lease awards has not dampened enthusiasm for existing projects that have already cleared regulatory hurdles. Market watchers are closely monitoring how policy decisions will influence the upcoming project pipeline.


UK and Ireland Invest in Ports and Supply Chains

The United Kingdom is making a strong push to enhance its offshore wind infrastructure. Two recent announcements stand out:

  1. Belfast Harbour Upgrade
    Northern Ireland’s largest port is committing £90 million to upgrade facilities for offshore wind staging, storage, and assembly. This includes large quay extensions, deep-water berths, and specialized equipment for turbine handling.
  2. Crown Estate Funding Boost
    The Crown Estate has pledged £400 million to support port readiness, supply chain growth, and larger turbine handling capabilities. The funds will help ports accommodate next-generation offshore wind components, which are significantly larger and more complex than earlier models.

Together, these investments are designed to ensure the UK remains a global leader in offshore wind deployment and manufacturing. They also support a government objective of securing 20 to 30 gigawatts of new leasing capacity by the end of the decade.

Infrastructure Needs for Next‑Gen Offshore Wind Turbines
Component / Feature Typical Size / Capacity Port Specification Supporting Equipment Needed
Floating Foundations 12–15 MW turbines, ~3,000 t structures Quay length ~500 m, load capacity 30–50 t/m², water depth 10–15 m Heavy-lift cranes (600–1,200 t), laydown yards (15–20 ha), wet storage (10–12 ha)
Blades & Towers Blades ~100–120 m; hub heights ~150–160 m Unrestricted air space; large outdoor laydown area Long-reach cranes, blade handling vehicles, staging racks
Turbine Assembly & Load-Out Monopile or semisub structure + nacelle/tower segments Deep berths for feeder vessels, high stability under heavy loads Jack-up or feeder vessels, heavy-lift cranes, reinforced quay
Channel & Berth Access Vessels up to 160 m long, 45 m beam, 6 m draft Channel width ≥100–150 m; berth depth ≥6 m Dredging, navigation aids, deep-draft vessel access
Cranes Lift capacity 600–1,200 t; boom height up to 170 m Crane pad capacity to support heavy static loads Shore cranes or crane vessels, slew-bearing structures
Laydown & Storage 15–20 ha for laydown; 10–12 ha wet storage Flat, secure staging areas near quay Cable reels, mobile lifts, pre-assembly rigs
Values reflect current infrastructure standards for handling 12–15 MW offshore wind turbine components. Requirements vary based on turbine design, port location, and deployment strategy.

Germany Introduces Radar Requirements for Security

As offshore infrastructure becomes more critical, concerns over site protection are growing. Germany recently introduced new regulations requiring offshore wind farms to install maritime radar systems. These systems are designed to detect and track vessels entering sensitive areas, helping operators monitor and secure energy assets from unauthorized activity.

This decision comes amid heightened geopolitical concerns, especially in European waters. The radar mandate is seen as part of a larger move to harden critical infrastructure against potential threats without disrupting ongoing energy production.


Canada Passes New Legislation to Enable Development

Canada is positioning itself as a rising player in offshore wind with new laws passed at both the federal and provincial levels. Newfoundland and Labrador recently enacted enabling legislation (Bill 49 and Bill 90) to allow for project bidding, environmental review, and offshore lease issuance.

Key components of the new regulatory framework include:

  • Clear permitting pathways for developers
  • Provincial-federal coordination on royalties and responsibilities
  • Support for research and environmental safeguards

With abundant wind resources and existing offshore expertise, Atlantic Canada is being eyed as a key growth region. Several developers are expected to submit proposals within the next year, setting the stage for long-term regional energy export potential.


Innovation in Tidal and Floating Wind Projects

While fixed-bottom offshore wind remains dominant, new technologies are gaining traction.

  • Floating Wind Projects
    Green Volt, a proposed floating wind farm off the northeast coast of Scotland, is advancing with a planned 560 megawatt capacity. This would make it one of the largest floating installations globally.
  • Tidal Energy Demonstrations
    SKF has announced a technical breakthrough that could improve the reliability and efficiency of tidal-stream turbines. If scaled, these upgrades could boost energy yields by up to 15 percent in key pilot sites.

The push into floating and tidal reflects a broader industry effort to expand renewable options beyond shallow continental shelf areas.

Floating vs Fixed‑Bottom Offshore Wind Comparison
Feature Fixed‑Bottom Wind Floating Wind Key Notes
Water Depth Range Up to ~60 m (some up to 75 m) Beyond ~60 m, up to 300 m+ Floating enables deep‑water deployment in new regions
Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) ~$115–120/MWh ~$175–180/MWh Floating costs roughly 1.5× higher currently
Capacity Factor ~45–50 % ~54–57 % Greater consistency of deep-water winds lifts floating output
Installation & Deployment Speed Well‑established; less complex Longer planning, high logistics complexity Floating requires mooring, tow‑out and port readiness
Environmental Impact Seabed piling, scour, loud pile‑driving Minimal seabed impact; mooring line effects more surface‑based Floating avoids pile noise and scour disturbance
Geographic Suitability Ideal for North Sea, Baltic, Atlantic shelves Expands deployment to U.S. West Coast, Japan, South Korea, Atlantic Canada Floating unlocks regions beyond continental shelves
Floating wind offers access to deeper and stronger wind zones but comes with higher costs and technical complexity. Cost reductions are expected over the next decade. Pricing reflects 2025 reference project values.

Europe Pushes for Integrated Maritime Strategies

The European Commission has launched new initiatives to create better coordination between energy developers, port authorities, and maritime industries. These efforts aim to:

  • Reduce project permitting delays
  • Align shipping and offshore construction schedules
  • Build specialized infrastructure for renewable deployment

A key element is supporting smaller regional ports that often lack the capacity to host large-scale construction efforts. Funding mechanisms are expected to support upgrades, training, and logistics streamlining.


Sector Outlook

The current landscape for offshore energy and renewables is both dynamic and promising. While policy shifts and economic pressures remain a challenge in some regions, the overall trajectory continues to lean toward long-term expansion.

Emerging themes to watch:

  • Strategic port upgrades as enablers of new capacity
  • Floating platforms unlocking previously inaccessible wind zones
  • Increased integration between digital infrastructure and clean energy
  • Regional coordination to streamline permitting and supply chains

As countries balance energy needs, climate goals, and national interests, offshore renewables remain a cornerstone of future energy planning. Developers and governments alike are finding ways to adapt, expand, and deliver results—both in megawatts and economic value.

News Summary
Region / Country Key Development Focus Area Status & Notes
Australia Developer reassessing commitment due to cost & permitting delays Policy, Grid Readiness BlueFloat Energy signals uncertainty; national targets under review
United States – Texas New lease awarded for offshore wind plus utility-data center Project Launch, Community Ownership First Black-owned U.S. utility project under development in Port Arthur
United States – Northeast Empire Wind 1 advances construction despite federal lease pause Project Continuity Phase 1 ongoing; Phase 2 on hold awaiting regulatory clarity
United Kingdom – Northern Ireland £90M investment to expand Belfast Harbour for turbine handling Port Infrastructure Supports staging for floating and large-scale fixed-bottom projects
United Kingdom – National £400M from Crown Estate to boost supply chain readiness Supply Chain & Capacity Targets port upgrades and turbine logistics for 2030 goals
Germany Mandates radar systems for offshore wind security Infrastructure Protection Aims to deter unauthorized vessels and protect grid nodes
Canada – Atlantic Provinces New federal-provincial laws enable offshore wind permitting Regulatory Framework Bills C-49 and C-90 passed; proposals expected by 2026
Scotland Green Volt 560 MW floating wind farm progressing Floating Wind Set to become one of the largest floating projects globally
Global Tidal energy tech sees performance breakthrough Innovation SKF reports higher tidal-stream output with new design features
Note: This table summarizes mid-2025 developments shaping offshore wind worldwide, based on confirmed national investments, permitting updates, and deployment milestones.
By the ShipUniverse Editorial Team — About Us | Contact