Green Shipping Tech You Can Actually Install in 2025

Shaft generators harness the rotational energy of the main engine shaft to produce electricity. This reduces or even replaces the need to run auxiliary generators while underway, cutting down fuel use and emissions.

• Converts propulsion shaft power into onboard electrical energy
• Reduces reliance on auxiliary gensets during passage
• Lowers fuel consumption and extends genset maintenance cycles

• 2–5% depending on vessel size and engine load profile

• Roughly 2–3 years with consistent sailing schedules

• $250,000–$600,000 (system + installation)

• Typically installed during dry dock retrofits
• Requires shaft coupling, electrical integration, and space for control systems
• Estimated downtime: 4–6 weeks depending on ship layout

• Wärtsilä, Siemens, ABB

Air Lubrication Systems (ALS) reduce friction between a vessel's hull and the water by creating a layer of air bubbles beneath the hull. This technology decreases drag, leading to significant fuel savings and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

• Injects air beneath the hull to form a continuous layer of bubbles
• Reduces skin friction resistance between the hull and seawater
• Enhances fuel efficiency and lowers CO₂ emissions

• 5–10% depending on vessel type and operating conditions

• Approximately 2–5 years, influenced by fuel prices and voyage patterns

• $500,000–$1.5 million, varying with ship size and system complexity

• Typically installed during scheduled dry dock periods
• Installation duration: approximately 10–30 days, depending on vessel size and retrofit complexity

• Silverstream Technologies, Alfa Laval, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Damen Shipyards

Fuel additives and engine tuning solutions enhance combustion efficiency, reduce emissions, and improve overall engine performance. These interventions are cost-effective and can be implemented with minimal downtime.

• Enhances fuel combustion for better efficiency
• Reduces carbon deposits and engine wear
• Improves engine responsiveness and longevity

• 3–7% depending on vessel type and operating conditions

• Typically within 6–12 months, influenced by fuel prices and voyage patterns

• Fuel additives: $0.05–$0.15 per gallon of fuel treated
• Engine tuning services: $2,000–$10,000 depending on vessel size and complexity

• Fuel additives can be introduced during regular refueling operations
• Engine tuning typically requires 1–3 days, often scheduled during routine maintenance

• ValvTect, Trinity Fuel Additives, Advanced Fuel Solutions, Fitch Fuel Catalyst, Bell Performance

Voyage Optimization Software utilizes advanced algorithms and real-time data to determine the most efficient routes and speeds for vessels. By considering factors like weather conditions, sea currents, and port congestion, this software helps in reducing fuel consumption, emissions, and operational costs.

• Calculates optimal routes and speeds based on real-time data
• Integrates weather forecasts, sea conditions, and port schedules
• Provides actionable insights for fuel-efficient voyage planning

• 5–10% depending on voyage length and conditions

• Typically within 6–12 months, influenced by fuel prices and voyage patterns

• Annual subscription: $20,000–$100,000 per vessel, varying by provider and features

• Software-based solution with minimal hardware requirements
• Installation duration: typically 1–3 days, depending on system integration

• Nautilus Labs, NAPA, StormGeo, ABB, ZeroNorth

Variable Speed Drives (VSDs) adjust the speed of pumps and fans to match the actual demand, leading to significant energy savings and reduced wear on equipment. In marine HVAC systems, this technology enhances efficiency and contributes to lower operational costs.

• Modulates pump and fan speeds based on real-time demand
• Reduces energy consumption by avoiding constant full-speed operation
• Minimizes mechanical stress, extending equipment lifespan

• Up to 50% energy savings for specific applications, depending on system design and operation

• Typically within 1–2 years, influenced by energy prices and usage patterns

• $40,000–$100,000, varying with system size and complexity

• Installation can often be completed during regular maintenance periods
• Installation duration: approximately 1–2 weeks, depending on vessel configuration

• ABB, DESMI, Armstrong Fluid Technology, Alfa Laval

Battery systems store energy for propulsion and auxiliary power, enabling vessels to operate more efficiently and reduce emissions. They are particularly effective in hybrid configurations, allowing for optimized engine loading and reduced fuel consumption.

• Stores energy for propulsion and auxiliary systems
• Enables hybrid operation, reducing engine load fluctuations
• Facilitates zero-emission operations in sensitive areas

• 5–20% depending on vessel type and operational profile

• Approximately 3–7 years, influenced by fuel prices and usage patterns

• $800–$1,000 per kWh for retrofits; $500 per kWh for newbuilds
• Total system cost varies based on capacity and vessel requirements

• Typically installed during scheduled dry dock periods
• Installation duration: approximately 2–6 weeks, depending on system size and vessel configuration

• Corvus Energy, Saft, ABB, Leclanché, Echandia

Cold ironing (also known as shore power) allows vessels to shut down their auxiliary engines while at berth and plug into shore-side electrical power. This significantly reduces port emissions and local air pollution, while lowering onboard fuel usage.

• Connects vessel to shore-side electrical grid while docked
• Eliminates the need to run diesel auxiliary engines in port
• Reduces fuel burn, noise, and port emissions

• 30–50 tons of fuel saved per year per vessel (depending on port stays)

• Approximately 3–6 years, depending on port power availability and fuel type

• $400,000–$1.2 million for retrofit, depending on ship size and voltage configuration

• Usually completed during dry dock or major electrical refits
• Installation duration: 2–4 weeks depending on vessel complexity

• Siemens, Schneider Electric, Cavotec, ABB, Wabtec

Waste Heat Recovery Systems (WHRS) capture thermal energy from engine exhaust and other onboard sources, converting it into usable power or heat. This process enhances overall energy efficiency, reduces fuel consumption, and lowers greenhouse gas emissions.

• Captures waste heat from engine exhaust and cooling systems
• Converts thermal energy into electrical power or auxiliary heat
• Reduces fuel consumption and emissions by utilizing otherwise wasted energy

• 5–14% depending on vessel type and operational profile

• Approximately 2–5 years, influenced by fuel prices and voyage patterns

• $5,000,000–$9,500,000, varying with system size and complexity

• Typically installed during scheduled dry dock periods
• Installation duration: approximately 4–8 weeks, depending on vessel configuration

• Alfa Laval, ABB, ElectraTherm, Enertime, Cain Industries

Ballast Water Treatment Systems are essential for compliance with the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Ballast Water Management Convention. They prevent the spread of invasive aquatic species by treating ballast water before discharge, ensuring environmental protection and regulatory adherence.

• Removes or neutralizes invasive organisms in ballast water
• Ensures compliance with IMO and USCG regulations
• Protects marine ecosystems from non-native species

• Mandatory for vessels over 400 GT under the IMO BWM Convention
• Avoids fines (e.g., $50,000 annually) and port entry restrictions
• Enhances market access and operational flexibility

• Approximately 1.5–3 years, influenced by operational routes and compliance benefits

• $500,000–$1.5 million, varying with vessel size, system type (UV, electrochlorination), and retrofit complexity

• Typically installed during scheduled dry dock periods
• Installation duration: approximately 2–4 weeks, depending on vessel configuration and system complexity

• Alfa Laval, Wärtsilä, ERMA FIRST, Optimarin, Ecochlor, De Nora, Hyde Marine

Emissions Monitoring Systems (EMS), including Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) and Predictive Emissions Monitoring Systems (PEMS), are essential for tracking and reporting pollutants such as NOx, SOx, CO₂, and particulate matter. These systems ensure compliance with international regulations like IMO MARPOL Annex VI and support environmental sustainability initiatives.

• Continuously measures and records emissions from ship exhaust systems
• Provides real-time data for regulatory compliance and operational optimization
• Integrates with shipboard systems for automated reporting and alerts

• Ensures adherence to international emissions regulations (e.g., IMO MARPOL Annex VI)
• Facilitates participation in emissions trading schemes and environmental certifications
• Enhances transparency and accountability in environmental reporting

• Approximately 2–4 years, influenced by regulatory requirements and operational efficiencies

• $100,000–$500,000, varying with system complexity and vessel size

• Typically installed during scheduled maintenance or dry dock periods
• Installation duration: approximately 1–3 weeks, depending on vessel configuration and system complexity

• ABB, Siemens, HORIBA, Martek Marine, Emsys Maritime, Danfoss IXA

Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems (WAPS) harness wind energy to supplement a vessel's main propulsion, reducing fuel consumption and emissions. Technologies include rotor sails, rigid wing sails, suction wings, and kite systems, each offering varying benefits depending on vessel type and operational profile.

• Captures wind energy to provide additional thrust
• Reduces engine load, leading to lower fuel consumption
• Decreases greenhouse gas emissions and operational costs

• 5–20% depending on vessel type, route, and wind conditions

• Approximately 3–5 years, influenced by fuel prices, operational profile, and available incentives

• $1.5 million–$3 million, varying with system type, vessel size, and retrofit complexity

• Typically installed during scheduled dry dock periods
• Installation duration: approximately 2–4 weeks, depending on system type and vessel configuration

• Norsepower, BAR Technologies, Anemoi Marine Technologies, SkySails, Oceanbird

Advanced hull coatings are no longer just paint—they’re part of integrated performance systems that reduce drag, cut emissions, and now include real-time monitoring. In 2025, the best coatings are paired with sensors, digital dashboards, and even subscription models that reward efficiency.

• Prevents biofouling and maintains smooth hull performance
• Reduces drag, improving fuel efficiency by up to 15%
• Many now integrate with hull monitoring platforms for fuel ROI tracking

• Up to 10–15% depending on operating conditions and coating system

• Typically 4–6 months—longer-lasting coatings yield higher long-term returns

• Material Costs: $20–$100 per square meter, varying by coating type
• Installation Costs: $50–$200 per square meter, depending on surface preparation and application complexity
• For a midsize vessel (~2,000 m² hull area): Total cost ranges from $140,000 to $600,000

• Applied during dry dock using specialized equipment
• Installation duration: typically 7–14 days depending on vessel size
• Some newer programs offer “Hull Performance-as-a-Service” with no upfront cost

• Hempel: Hempaguard X7 (long-life silicone coating)
• Jotun: Hull Skating + SeaQuantum + Jotun HullKeeper performance monitoring
• Nippon Paint Marine: Aquaterras (biocide-free coating)
• AkzoNobel: Intersleek 1100SR (foul release, silicone-based)