HMM Goes Big on Autonomous Navigation
HMM has signed contracts to install HD Hyundai Avikus’s AI-based autonomous navigation system across 40 HMM-operated vessels, moving the tech from limited trials into a broad operational deployment. The shipping impact is less about a single feature and more about repeatable fleet behavior: tighter route and speed discipline, standardized bridge decision support, and a measurable shift in how safety and fuel-efficiency procedures get executed day after day.
Click here for 30 second summary
HMM turns autonomous navigation into a fleet operating standard
Reports say HMM has contracted to install Avikus’s AI-based autonomous navigation system (HiNAS Control) on 40 HMM-operated vessels, alongside a technical cooperation framework with HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering and Avikus. The key shipping takeaway is scale: consistent route, speed, and decision-support behavior across many ships is a different impact than a one-off trial.
-
Scale signal
Forty ships in the first wave moves autonomy into everyday operations and makes benchmarking across routes and seasons possible. -
Efficiency lever
The likely pathway is tighter route and speed discipline and fewer small corrections that add up over long legs, with results dependent on trade, weather, and operating practices. -
Governance cue
External coverage has described reviewed frameworks for evaluating fuel-savings potential using operational data, which helps turn “claims” into measurable fleet reporting.
HMM’s rollout makes autonomous navigation a scale story: the market now watches for real-voyage evidence on fuel consistency, procedural changes on the bridge, and the pace of expansion beyond the first 40 ships.
| Focus | Verified rollout facts | Operational mechanism | Shipping impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rollout scale | HMM signed contracts to apply Avikus’s autonomous navigation solution to 40 HMM-operated vessels. | Fleet-scale deployment turns a capability into standard operating rhythm: repeated use, comparable data, and consistent procedures across ships. | Impacts show up as a “system effect” across voyages, not a one-ship anecdote: better repeatability in routing and bridge decisions. |
| System name | The solution is Avikus “HiNAS Control,” described as an AI-based autonomous navigation system for commercial ships. | Combines route/speed support with autonomous control elements designed to keep ships tracking an intended path more precisely. | More consistent track-keeping and speed behavior can tighten schedule predictability and reduce variance-driven fuel waste. |
| Corporate tie-up | Reporting also references an MoU with HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering and Avikus for joint research and technical collaboration. | R&D linkage typically accelerates feature iteration, integration, and “class/approval comfort” for broader adoption. | Shortens the gap between operational feedback and product updates, which matters when you are deploying across many ships. |
| Fuel-efficiency pathway | External reporting on Avikus technology highlights verified fuel-use reduction potential under certain conditions. | Route optimization and steadier speed discipline reduce unnecessary course corrections and “extra miles,” supporting lower consumption. | Even small percentage improvements matter at scale: savings compound across long-haul container rotations and high utilization. |
| Bridge workflow shift | This is positioned as operational technology adoption at scale, rather than a limited one-off pilot. | Bridge teams shift toward monitoring + cross-checking system recommendations and automated control behavior within procedures. | Changes training emphasis and audit posture: procedures and competence become more standardized across the fleet. |
| Safety posture | Avikus and third-party coverage describes autonomous navigation as improving situational awareness and collision-avoidance support. | Decision support + route tracking can reduce workload peaks and help maintain consistent watchkeeping performance. | Insurers and vetting processes often track whether new tech reduces incident probability or simply shifts failure modes. |
| Commercial ripple | HMM is a major container operator; a 40-ship deployment is large enough to be noticeable in fleet behavior. | Standardized performance enables tighter internal benchmarking and potentially more confident speed/arrival management. | Over time, that can translate into more reliable schedules, fewer fuel surprises, and a clearer emissions-performance story for customers. |
The operational shift is standardization: route, speed, and bridge decision support at scale
Multiple reports say HMM has contracted to install Avikus’s AI-based autonomous navigation system (HiNAS Control) across 40 HMM-operated vessels, with a path to broader rollout after evaluation. That changes the shipping conversation from “does it work?” to “how quickly does it become normal practice across watches, trades, and seasons?”
What changes on the bridge when autonomy becomes routine
Watchkeeping shifts toward supervised execution
The crew’s job tilts from constant manual micro-adjustments toward monitoring, cross-checking, and intervening within procedures when conditions or rules demand it.
Less “variance fuel burn” on long runs
The biggest efficiency gains often come from tightening route and speed discipline and reducing unnecessary corrections, especially over long ocean legs where small deviations compound.
A single fleet standard enables benchmarking
When many ships run the same system, performance becomes comparable across voyages. That makes it easier to spot which ships, routes, or conditions deliver real savings and which do not.
Rollout footprint and maturity signals
First-wave coverage (ships)
40 vessels
Reports describe 40 operated ships as the initial deployment set, with potential expansion based on results.
Vendor installed base (context)
~350 ships supplied (reported)
This matters because it hints at production, support, and update cadence beyond a boutique deployment.
Governance signal
Verification framework reviewed (reported)
Independent review of fuel-savings methodology is a “scale enabler” because it gives operators a defensible way to measure impact.
Fleet fuel and CO2 scenario lens (user-controlled)
This is a scenario tool. It does not assume a guaranteed savings rate. If you want a starting point for CO2, a commonly used heavy fuel oil factor is 3.114 tonnes CO2 per tonne fuel.
Ships covered in first wave
40 ships
Sea days per ship per year
250 days
Baseline fuel burn at sea (tonnes/day)
80.0 t/day
Scenario fuel reduction from improved routing/speed discipline (percent)
2.5%
CO2 factor (tonnes CO2 per tonne fuel)
3.114
Annual fuel (scale): 0 t
Fuel saved (scale): 0 t
CO2 avoided (scale): 0 t
Per ship fuel saved: 0 t/year
Reported trials and verification efforts around HiNAS Control discuss savings under specific conditions. Treat any percentage as scenario-based until HMM’s fleet data is published or otherwise evidenced.
Why assurance matters as much as algorithms
For fleet-scale deployment, the practical question becomes measurement and governance: how savings and safety effects are assessed, audited, and compared across ships and conditions.
- External coverage has described an ABS-reviewed framework for evaluating fuel-savings potential using operational data from vessels with HiNAS Control installed.
- That kind of methodology reduces arguments later about whether gains came from the system, the weather, the route, or human behavior changes.
- It also helps when the results need to be communicated consistently to customers, insurers, and internal performance teams.
The commercial read-through for a major liner
- More predictable speed and track-keeping can tighten ETA reliability and reduce “catch-up” fuel burn.
- Standardized behavior across ships makes it easier to run internal A/B comparisons and decide whether to expand deployment.
- For customers, the biggest visible change tends to be consistency: fewer surprises in transit-time variance and emissions reporting.
With 40 ships slated for the first deployment wave, HMM’s move frames autonomy as an operating standard rather than an experiment. The next information the market will look for is evidence from real voyages: whether the fleet-level data supports measurable fuel and schedule consistency gains, and how bridge procedures and governance evolve once the system becomes routine.
We welcome your feedback, suggestions, corrections, and ideas for enhancements. Please click here to get in touch.